Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 36

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

shadowville.com

Beats by Shadowville Productions

Page Load Speed

31.3 sec in total

First Response

14.9 sec

Resources Loaded

16.1 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

About Website

Welcome to shadowville.com homepage info - get ready to check Shadowville best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about shadowville.com

Shadowville.com is the most visited website for hip hop, pop, and R&B instrumentals and soundtracks.

Visit shadowville.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shadowville.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14.9 sec and then it took 16.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shadowville.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shadowville.com

14922 ms

style.css

21 ms

_stylesheet.css

26 ms

cart.css

22 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Shadowville.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Shadowville.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 481.5 kB (48%)

Content Size

996.0 kB

After Optimization

514.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shadowville.com main page is 996.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 674.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 114.7 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 119.4 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 125.2 kB
  • After minification 113.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shadowville images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 301.2 kB

  • Original 674.6 kB
  • After minification 649.6 kB
  • After compression 373.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 301.2 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 51.2 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shadowville.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (65%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shadowville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

shadowville.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

shadowville.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shadowville.com SEO score

36

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shadowville.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shadowville.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shadowville. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: