Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

slim.com

Home | Slim.com

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

About Website

Visit slim.com now to see the best up-to-date Slim content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slim.com

Visit slim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slim.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.slim.com

1046 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

66 ms

minified.js

69 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

117 ms

polyfill.min.js

1043 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Slim.com, 34% (15 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 32% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Slim.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 484.9 kB (53%)

Content Size

917.0 kB

After Optimization

432.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Slim.com main page is 917.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 464.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 374.3 kB

  • Original 464.8 kB
  • After minification 463.2 kB
  • After compression 90.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 374.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 119.3 kB
  • After minification 104.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slim needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 96.0 kB

  • Original 332.9 kB
  • After minification 332.8 kB
  • After compression 236.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.0 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (41%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

slim.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

slim.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

slim.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slim. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: