Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

snapback.se

Snapback

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

474 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snapback content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snapback.se

Visit snapback.se

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapback.se page load time and found that the first response time was 474 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snapback.se performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snapback.se

474 ms

1296 ms

bundle.css

340 ms

basedinsweden.png

423 ms

bundle.js

520 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Snapback.se, 80% (4 requests) were made to Rymdweb.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Rymdweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.8 kB (64%)

Content Size

187.0 kB

After Optimization

67.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Snapback.se main page is 187.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 113.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 46.1 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Snapback needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 94.9 kB

  • Original 113.2 kB
  • After minification 113.1 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapback.se needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapback. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

snapback.se accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

snapback.se best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

snapback.se SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    SV

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapback.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapback.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: