Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

softwaregarden.com

Software Garden, Inc. Website

Page Load Speed

832 ms in total

First Response

155 ms

Resources Loaded

341 ms

Page Rendered

336 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Software Garden content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about softwaregarden.com

Visit softwaregarden.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Softwaregarden.com page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 677 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

softwaregarden.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

softwaregarden.com

155 ms

normal.css

24 ms

dvdcover1.jpg

51 ms

podcastmike2.gif

71 ms

NoteTakerHDIcon-72x72.jpg

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Softwaregarden.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (155 ms) belongs to the original domain Softwaregarden.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.2 kB (33%)

Content Size

69.9 kB

After Optimization

46.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Softwaregarden.com main page is 69.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Software Garden needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 4.0 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Softwaregarden.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Software Garden. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

softwaregarden.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

softwaregarden.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

softwaregarden.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Softwaregarden.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Softwaregarden.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Software Garden. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: