Access squidspot.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

squidspot.com

47 ms

www.leighton-moon.com

75 ms

gnX7xLfDPIWRQc062ztXHavB7dmGnMsNc7dcLl_qEEvfeCXIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDjUZcmcZcwUjDmyZ2juFQS3wDwaZQj35s7bMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0S1mKpPuydYgyjhIliaT1FkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8OeU8-AiGieN0OAuzdht0jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUkiA4oOABCSeBRjPuapcSaO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikoCZA81-YszdKuldhN0OcFzdPUaiaS0S1mKpPuydYgyjhIliaT1FkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCiaiaO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXK2es8ZamCjWJliemtifJeZhN3-emkJ6T0ZWSlSagTSc8XH6GJrlCfIMMjgfMfH6GJxFCfIMMjgPMfH6GJxlCfIMMjgKMfH6GJ6F3fIMMjgkMfH6GJrNCfIMMj2KMfH6GJxiCfIMMj2kMfH6GJ6i3fIMMjIPMfH6GJ0N9fIMIjgPMfH6GJxrbfIMJjgkMfqMeQhv7Lg6.js

72 ms

legacy.js

54 ms

modern.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Squidspot.com, 43% (19 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 23% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (854 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Squidspot.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 170.2 kB

Original 196.3 kB
After minification 177.6 kB
After compression 26.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 103.3 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Squidspot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 489.3 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB
After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.3 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 140 B

Original 15.6 kB
After minification 15.6 kB
After compression 15.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Squidspot.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Squidspot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.