15.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
13.1 sec
683 ms
Visit stonewashersjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Stone Washer S Journal content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonewashersjournal.com
【新着記事一覧ページへ】
Visit stonewashersjournal.comWe analyzed Stonewashersjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 13.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
stonewashersjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
16/100
10%
1492 ms
886 ms
433 ms
385 ms
388 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Stonewashersjournal.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) relates to the external source Tracker.kantan-access.com.
Page size can be reduced by 343.5 kB (52%)
660.9 kB
317.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonewashersjournal.com main page is 660.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 234.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stone Washer S Journal needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 144.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonewashersjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (59%)
86
35
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Washer S Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
stonewashersjournal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
stonewashersjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stonewashersjournal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonewashersjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonewashersjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
stonewashersjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stone Washer S Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: