Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

typekit.com

Adobe Fonts | Explore unlimited fonts

Page Load Speed

20.9 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

20.7 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

About Website

Visit typekit.com now to see the best up-to-date Typekit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about typekit.com

Adobe Fonts partners with the world’s leading type foundries to bring thousands of beautiful fonts to designers every day. No need to worry about licensing, and you can use fonts from Adobe Fonts on t...

Visit typekit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Typekit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 20.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

typekit.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value44.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,870 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

typekit.com

9 ms

fonts.adobe.com

417 ms

spectrum-b24eddf26ff933129049c07f1a6c5faaecd4e85b32aeef26935d93bdaa51f8f4.css

73 ms

uhb4nat.js

136 ms

runtime-848533fd3173e7148120.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Typekit.com, 78% (25 requests) were made to Afwebcdn.fonts.adobe.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.adobe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Adobe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.7 kB (22%)

Content Size

927.0 kB

After Optimization

724.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Typekit.com main page is 927.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 355.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 123.7 kB

  • Original 165.0 kB
  • After minification 161.0 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 71.9 kB

  • Original 337.2 kB
  • After minification 265.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Typekit needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 355.3 kB
  • After minification 355.3 kB
  • After compression 352.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB
  • After compression 65.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typekit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typekit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

typekit.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Best Practices

typekit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

typekit.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typekit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Typekit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Typekit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: