Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

usenet-anbietervergleich.de

Usenet Provider Vergleich und Informationen zum Usenet, Anbieter Usenext, Firstload und Usenet.nl gratis testen und kostenlos downloaden

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

340 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Usenet Anbieter Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usenet-anbietervergleich.de

Usenet Provider mit Testzugang im Vergleich, Informationen zum Usenet, Tipps zum kostenlosen Download von Dateien aus dem Usenet

Visit usenet-anbietervergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Usenet-anbietervergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

usenet-anbietervergleich.de performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

usenet-anbietervergleich.de

340 ms

header.jpg

612 ms

button2.jpg

180 ms

button8.jpg

187 ms

button5.jpg

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Usenet-anbietervergleich.de, 4% (2 requests) were made to 4stats.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Usenet-anbietervergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

667.8 kB

After Optimization

548.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Usenet-anbietervergleich.de main page is 667.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 617.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 617.4 kB
  • After minification 534.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Usenet Anbieter Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

55

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usenet Anbieter Vergleich. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

usenet-anbietervergleich.de accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

usenet-anbietervergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

usenet-anbietervergleich.de SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usenet-anbietervergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usenet-anbietervergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usenet Anbieter Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: