Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

vipbacking.com

彩神在线网信彩票-彩神通免费版下载-彩神8争霸vlll-彩神购彩购彩大厅-彩神软件陆立根免费版-彩神ll争霸3-彩神ll彩神8-彩神ll争霸彩票-拼搏在线彩神网网页版

Page Load Speed

12 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

737 ms

About Website

Welcome to vipbacking.com homepage info - get ready to check Vipbacking best content right away, or after learning these important things about vipbacking.com

欢迎老哥大驾光临彩神x购彩大厅,彩神ll购彩大厅,彩神彩票争霸8,welcome彩神彩神,彩神8争霸vlll,彩神8争霸彩票入口,彩神ll争霸旧版,彩神ll争霸8,彩神llv首页,彩神争8大快发c彩61,彩神在线网信彩票,彩神8争霸app在线登录,拼搏在线彩神软件官网,拼搏在线彩神网网页版,拼搏在线彩票,彩神lll号娱乐,彩神之首专家专栏,彩神神争霸8最新版本,网信welcome彩票彩神,福彩we...

Visit vipbacking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vipbacking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vipbacking.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vipbacking.com

1188 ms

analytics.js

27 ms

swiper.min.css

289 ms

style.css

297 ms

tm-woocommerce-package.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 155 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (140 requests) were addressed to the original Vipbacking.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vipbacking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 444.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

16.8 MB

After Optimization

16.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vipbacking.com main page is 16.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 272.3 kB

  • Original 312.3 kB
  • After minification 310.4 kB
  • After compression 40.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 97.4 kB

  • Original 15.9 MB
  • After minification 15.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vipbacking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 376.1 kB
  • After minification 375.7 kB
  • After compression 318.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 231.3 kB
  • After minification 231.3 kB
  • After compression 214.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vipbacking.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (64%)

Requests Now

147

After Optimization

53

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 147 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vipbacking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 62 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

vipbacking.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vipbacking.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vipbacking.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vipbacking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vipbacking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vipbacking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: