738 ms in total
105 ms
524 ms
109 ms
Visit vital.vendorrisk.com now to see the best up-to-date Vital Vendor Risk content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vital.vendorrisk.com
Visit vital.vendorrisk.comWe analyzed Vital.vendorrisk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 633 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
vital.vendorrisk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
105 ms
82 ms
81 ms
54 ms
110 ms
Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vital.vendorrisk.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (110 ms) belongs to the original domain Vital.vendorrisk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.7 kB (81%)
215.4 kB
40.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Vital.vendorrisk.com main page is 215.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 206.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 646 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vital Vendor Risk needs image optimization as it can save up to 646 B or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vital.vendorrisk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
5
5
The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vital Vendor Risk. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
vital.vendorrisk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
vital.vendorrisk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vital.vendorrisk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vital.vendorrisk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vital.vendorrisk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
vital.vendorrisk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vital Vendor Risk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: