Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

webtoolkit.info

webtoolkit.info - Code Snippets Repository

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

154 ms

Resources Loaded

767 ms

Page Rendered

204 ms

About Website

Visit webtoolkit.info now to see the best up-to-date Webtoolkit content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webtoolkit.info

a simple way to share code snippets and pastes with others.

Visit webtoolkit.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Webtoolkit.info page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 971 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webtoolkit.info performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value15,520 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webtoolkit.info

154 ms

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.css

45 ms

arduino_ide_copy_ver_2.6.5.css

72 ms

monaco_ver_2.6.5.css

73 ms

styles_ver_1.4.4.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webtoolkit.info, 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) belongs to the original domain Webtoolkit.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 378.7 kB (51%)

Content Size

738.3 kB

After Optimization

359.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Webtoolkit.info main page is 738.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 393.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 165.6 kB
  • After minification 161.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webtoolkit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 224.7 kB

  • Original 393.1 kB
  • After minification 371.4 kB
  • After compression 168.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.7 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 133.1 kB

  • Original 157.9 kB
  • After minification 131.4 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtoolkit.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (76%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtoolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

webtoolkit.info accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

webtoolkit.info best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webtoolkit.info SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtoolkit.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webtoolkit.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: