Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

716 ms

About Website

Visit wharf-restaurant.com now to see the best up-to-date Wharf Restaurant content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wharf-restaurant.com

TESLA338 adalah situs slot gacor online hari ini gampang menang jackpot dengan winrate tinggi dari provider resmi terpercaya indonesia.

Visit wharf-restaurant.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wharf-restaurant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wharf-restaurant.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.903

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wharf-restaurant.com

30 ms

wharf-restaurant.com

160 ms

hareandhart.com

181 ms

paperwhitespress.com

169 ms

worshipfulliving.com

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 537 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wharf-restaurant.com, 92% (496 requests) were made to Dsuown9evwz4y.cloudfront.net and 2% (11 requests) were made to Nationjs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Api2-tl3.imgnxb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.5 MB (29%)

Content Size

19.1 MB

After Optimization

13.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Wharf-restaurant.com main page is 19.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 542.5 kB

  • Original 571.5 kB
  • After minification 415.0 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 156.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 542.5 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 4.9 MB

  • Original 18.6 MB
  • After minification 13.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wharf Restaurant needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 MB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 773 B
  • After minification 773 B
  • After compression 475 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wharf-restaurant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298 B or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (5%)

Requests Now

524

After Optimization

496

The browser has sent 524 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wharf Restaurant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wharf-restaurant.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wharf-restaurant.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wharf-restaurant.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wharf-restaurant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is . Our system also found out that Wharf-restaurant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wharf Restaurant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: