1.2 sec in total
369 ms
730 ms
118 ms
Click here to check amazing Whitemedia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whitemedia.org
Visit whitemedia.orgWe analyzed Whitemedia.org page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 848 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
whitemedia.org performance score
369 ms
342 ms
361 ms
Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Whitemedia.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (369 ms) belongs to the original domain Whitemedia.org.
Page size can be reduced by 3.1 kB (34%)
8.9 kB
5.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Whitemedia.org main page is 8.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 5.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitemedia images are well optimized though.
We found no issues to fix!
2
2
The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitemedia. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
whitemedia.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whitemedia.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
whitemedia.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitemedia.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Whitemedia.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
whitemedia.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whitemedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: