Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

xpaw.me

xPaw ⚡ Pavel Djundik

Page Load Speed

631 ms in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

385 ms

Page Rendered

118 ms

About Website

Visit xpaw.me now to see the best up-to-date XPaw content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xpaw.me

Pavel is a full-stack developer, data miner, creator of SteamDB.

Visit xpaw.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Xpaw.me page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 503 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xpaw.me performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xpaw.me

128 ms

cloudflare.min.js

61 ms

css

95 ms

font-awesome.min.css

78 ms

ga.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xpaw.me, 20% (1 request) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (128 ms) belongs to the original domain Xpaw.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.2 kB (58%)

Content Size

111.5 kB

After Optimization

47.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xpaw.me main page is 111.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 78.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

  • Original 78.2 kB
  • After minification 78.2 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 51% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 27.7 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xpaw.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XPaw. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

xpaw.me accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

xpaw.me best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

xpaw.me SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xpaw.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xpaw.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XPaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: