635 ms in total
92 ms
379 ms
164 ms
Welcome to asheville.backpage.com homepage info - get ready to check Asheville Backpage best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about asheville.backpage.com
Visit asheville.backpage.comWe analyzed Asheville.backpage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 543 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
asheville.backpage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
92 ms
40 ms
83 ms
57 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Asheville.backpage.com, 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (134 ms) belongs to the original domain Asheville.backpage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (67%)
306.2 kB
101.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Asheville.backpage.com main page is 306.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 119.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Asheville Backpage needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asheville.backpage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)
9
6
The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asheville Backpage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
asheville.backpage.com
92 ms
Global.css
40 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
83 ms
global-compiled.js
57 ms
gtm.js
82 ms
menu-central.png
34 ms
search-central.png
31 ms
logo_main.png
32 ms
select-icon-blue.png
134 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
asheville.backpage.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
asheville.backpage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
asheville.backpage.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asheville.backpage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Asheville.backpage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
asheville.backpage.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Asheville Backpage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: