Tools & Wizards About Us
babygoodname.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

babygoodname.com

利来w66官网app_利来娱乐_利来国际平台登录网址_利来娱乐官网~w6829.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

837 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

babygoodname.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Babygoodname content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about babygoodname.com

Visit babygoodname.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Babygoodname.com page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 962 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babygoodname.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

babygoodname.com

190 ms

jquery.min.js

76 ms

bh.php

69 ms

cf.php

119 ms

adframe.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Babygoodname.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Dp.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) belongs to the original domain Babygoodname.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

117.5 kB

After Optimization

108.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Babygoodname.com main page is 117.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 800 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 865 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 800 B or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Babygoodname images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babygoodname.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babygoodname. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

babygoodname.com

babygoodname.com

190 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

76 ms

bh.php

bh.php

69 ms

cf.php

cf.php

119 ms

adframe.js

adframe.js

68 ms

master.css

master.css

65 ms

960.css

960.css

66 ms

68 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

caf.js

caf.js

69 ms

caf.js

caf.js

50 ms

reset.css

reset.css

33 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

35 ms

bg_springmorning_01.png

bg_springmorning_01.png

66 ms

baby_names.jpg

baby_names.jpg

106 ms

leftcap_springmorning_01.png

leftcap_springmorning_01.png

66 ms

rightcap_springmorning_01.png

rightcap_springmorning_01.png

67 ms

101_search_bg.png

101_search_bg.png

68 ms

footer_slice_gradient.png

footer_slice_gradient.png

69 ms

slave.html

slave.html

7 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

182 ms

bullet_doublearrow_orange.png

bullet_doublearrow_orange.png

22 ms

SEO Factors

babygoodname.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babygoodname.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Babygoodname.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

babygoodname.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babygoodname. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: