4.8 sec in total
305 ms
4.2 sec
288 ms
Welcome to backjournal.de homepage info - get ready to check Backjournal best content right away, or after learning these important things about backjournal.de
Back Journal
Visit backjournal.deWe analyzed Backjournal.de page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
backjournal.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
305 ms
1697 ms
199 ms
200 ms
695 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Backjournal.de, 15% (7 requests) were made to Adserver.ingerverlag.de and 9% (4 requests) were made to S2.adform.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Backjournal.de.
Page size can be reduced by 212.5 kB (16%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Backjournal.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 982.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Backjournal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 143.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Backjournal.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (37%)
43
27
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Backjournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
backjournal.de
305 ms
nachrichten.html
1697 ms
stylesheet_5d370599a3.css
199 ms
bj-styles.css
200 ms
spcjs.php
695 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
javascript_4ee89fa466.js
196 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
19 ms
445 ms
slightbox.css
99 ms
mootools.core.1.3.1.yui.js
297 ms
slimbox.1.7.1.yui.js
100 ms
spc.php
207 ms
fl.js
195 ms
bj-logo.png
100 ms
99eff71c57.jpg
102 ms
abcd4b61fd.jpg
965 ms
213977c6a5.jpg
99 ms
b5b53a5f39.jpg
197 ms
e93fd662d0.jpg
291 ms
b84ca2560b.jpg
198 ms
2f8218ec53.jpg
195 ms
f7bb490116.jpg
200 ms
e8da99ea83.jpeg
292 ms
2addb0ff84.jpg
292 ms
rssbutton.png
293 ms
45b0ec7123.jpg
296 ms
252f740590.jpg
394 ms
4c438cd1bd.png
576 ms
458bd604cc.jpg
395 ms
1c55f32f6b.jpg
396 ms
BJ-Button.png
408 ms
b4781f2bf9c4125f3a9797c7f4629399.jpg
195 ms
lg.php
160 ms
link-pdf.gif
456 ms
691bd7cc9cccaf2324197cd4373cc408.jpg
487 ms
lg.php
282 ms
Adform.Bootstrap.js
34 ms
130 ms
boot.js
26 ms
401 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
collect
13 ms
Standard
5 ms
13092573.gif
150 ms
100 ms
dark-top.css
4 ms
backjournal.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
backjournal.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
backjournal.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Backjournal.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Backjournal.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
backjournal.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Backjournal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: