Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

badartikel.de

Onlineshop für Ihr Bad, Badmöbel & Sanitär Bedarf | Badartikel Shop

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

382 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

138 ms

badartikel.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Badartikel content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about badartikel.de

badartikel.de! Ihr Partner rund um´s Bad ✓ Sanitär und Bäder ✓ Geprüfte Sicherheit. Kontakt & Service; Wissenswertes.

Visit badartikel.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Badartikel.de page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

badartikel.de performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

badartikel.de

382 ms

www.badartikel.de

647 ms

ceres-base.css

28 ms

cookie-bar.css

59 ms

widget-multi-columns.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Badartikel.de, 74% (23 requests) were made to Cdn02.plentymarkets.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Widgets.shopvote.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) relates to the external source Cdn02.plentymarkets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.3 kB (64%)

Content Size

291.1 kB

After Optimization

104.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Badartikel.de main page is 291.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 230.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 183.3 kB

  • Original 230.1 kB
  • After minification 206.6 kB
  • After compression 46.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 53.9 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Badartikel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 114 B

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (41%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Badartikel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

badartikel.de accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

badartikel.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

badartikel.de SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Badartikel.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Badartikel.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Badartikel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: