Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bag.bg

bag.bg - Дамски Чанти и Портфейли | Оригинални Маркови Модели

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

bag.bg screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bag.bg homepage info - get ready to check Bag best content for Bulgaria right away, or after learning these important things about bag.bg

Дамски Чанти и Портфейли ➤ Оригинални Маркови Модели от естествена и еко кожа ➤ Поръчай Онлайн ➤ Безплатна Доставка

Visit bag.bg

Key Findings

We analyzed Bag.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bag.bg performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bag.bg

46 ms

bag.bg

950 ms

analytics.js

59 ms

fbevents.js

23 ms

sdk.js

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Bag.bg, 5% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (950 ms) belongs to the original domain Bag.bg.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 498.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

515.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Bag.bg main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 663.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 497.3 kB

  • Original 663.6 kB
  • After minification 661.0 kB
  • After compression 166.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 497.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 604 B

  • Original 323.7 kB
  • After minification 323.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (30%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bag.bg accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bag.bg best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bag.bg SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    BG

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bag.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Bulgarian language. Our system also found out that Bag.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: