Tools & Wizards About Us
bahuteasy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

bahuteasy.com

Bahut Simple

Page Load Speed

12.1 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

11.2 sec

Page Rendered

673 ms

bahuteasy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bahuteasy.com homepage info - get ready to check Bahut Easy best content right away, or after learning these important things about bahuteasy.com

Indian LifeStyle, Leisure, Sports and Local Desi Services

Visit bahuteasy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bahuteasy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 11.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bahuteasy.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

bahuteasy.com

216 ms

styles.css

79 ms

css

270 ms

xeditable.css

195 ms

cloud-zoom.css

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Bahuteasy.com, 21% (15 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bahuteasy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (80%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

433.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bahuteasy.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 633.0 kB

  • Original 677.3 kB
  • After minification 594.1 kB
  • After compression 44.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 83.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 633.0 kB or 93% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 771.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 341.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 771.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 291.2 kB

  • Original 338.1 kB
  • After minification 264.0 kB
  • After compression 46.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bahuteasy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (89%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bahut Easy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bahuteasy.com

bahuteasy.com

216 ms

styles.css

styles.css

79 ms

css

css

270 ms

xeditable.css

xeditable.css

195 ms

cloud-zoom.css

cloud-zoom.css

229 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

230 ms

angular-material.min.css

angular-material.min.css

394 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

370 ms

animate.css

animate.css

231 ms

ui.datepicker.css

ui.datepicker.css

227 ms

loading-bar.css

loading-bar.css

323 ms

angularjs-datetime-picker.css

angularjs-datetime-picker.css

454 ms

js

js

499 ms

api.js

api.js

499 ms

js

js

499 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

498 ms

jquery-3.2.0.js

jquery-3.2.0.js

584 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

584 ms

jquery.jcarousel.js

jquery.jcarousel.js

453 ms

ui.datepicker.min.js

ui.datepicker.min.js

472 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

431 ms

angular-resource.min.js

angular-resource.min.js

474 ms

angular-route.min.js

angular-route.min.js

541 ms

angular-ui-router.min.js

angular-ui-router.min.js

555 ms

angular-animate.min.js

angular-animate.min.js

556 ms

angular-cookies.min.js

angular-cookies.min.js

552 ms

angular-translate.min.js

angular-translate.min.js

557 ms

angular-translate-storage-local.min.js

angular-translate-storage-local.min.js

928 ms

angular-translate-loader-url.min.js

angular-translate-loader-url.min.js

686 ms

angular-sanitize.min.js

angular-sanitize.min.js

555 ms

dirPagination.js

dirPagination.js

469 ms

angular-file-upload.min.js

angular-file-upload.min.js

658 ms

xeditable.min.js

xeditable.min.js

1111 ms

angular-ui.min.js

angular-ui.min.js

558 ms

ngDialog.min.js

ngDialog.min.js

558 ms

cloud-zoom.1.0.2.js

cloud-zoom.1.0.2.js

467 ms

angular-aria.min.js

angular-aria.min.js

572 ms

angular-material.min.js

angular-material.min.js

621 ms

angular-material.min.js

angular-material.min.js

427 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

535 ms

app.js

app.js

535 ms

directive.js

directive.js

534 ms

controller.js

controller.js

673 ms

service.js

service.js

553 ms

loading-bar.js

loading-bar.js

555 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

586 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

560 ms

jquery.jtweetsanywhere-1.3.1.min.js

jquery.jtweetsanywhere-1.3.1.min.js

579 ms

simpletabs_1.3.js

simpletabs_1.3.js

551 ms

form_elements.js

form_elements.js

579 ms

custom.js

custom.js

576 ms

angularjs-datetime-picker.js

angularjs-datetime-picker.js

590 ms

angular-touch.min.js

angular-touch.min.js

416 ms

ui-bootstrap-tpls.min.js

ui-bootstrap-tpls.min.js

1082 ms

angular-recaptcha.min.js

angular-recaptcha.min.js

596 ms

am.js

am.js

521 ms

reset.css

reset.css

586 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

593 ms

jcarousel_tango.css

jcarousel_tango.css

614 ms

simpletabs.css

simpletabs.css

595 ms

short_codes.css

short_codes.css

616 ms

base1020.css

base1020.css

672 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

567 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

594 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

870 ms

messageBundle

messageBundle

1549 ms

header.html

header.html

667 ms

footer.html

footer.html

407 ms

bahuteasycom

bahuteasycom

1669 ms

string

string

654 ms

leisure_index.html

leisure_index.html

1399 ms

SEO Factors

bahuteasy.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bahuteasy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Bahuteasy.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

bahuteasy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: