2.3 sec in total
152 ms
1.5 sec
617 ms
Welcome to bannertag.com homepage info - get ready to check BannerTag best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about bannertag.com
bannerTag.com provides news and analysis dedicated to website advertising. Optimization, Monetization, and Revenue Uplift techniques for blogs and websites.
Visit bannertag.comWe analyzed Bannertag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
bannertag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value15.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
152 ms
483 ms
48 ms
104 ms
703 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Bannertag.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cmp.setupcmp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) relates to the external source Ads.rubiconproject.com.
Page size can be reduced by 220.1 kB (47%)
466.4 kB
246.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bannertag.com main page is 466.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 251.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 220.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (91%)
74
7
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BannerTag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bannertag.com
152 ms
www.bannertag.com
483 ms
cmp-stub.js
48 ms
cmp-v1.js
104 ms
13606_Bannertag.js
703 ms
gpt.js
80 ms
styles.css
35 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.css
27 ms
style-frontend-pro.css
26 ms
trx_addons_icons-embedded.css
33 ms
swiper.min.css
39 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
298 ms
trx_addons.css
38 ms
trx_addons.animation.css
43 ms
custom.css
43 ms
style.css
78 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
156 ms
frontend.min.css
94 ms
swiper.min.css
93 ms
all.min.css
138 ms
v4-shims.min.css
136 ms
pwaforwp-main.min.css
137 ms
stylesheet.css
141 ms
fontello-embedded.css
164 ms
__custom.css
152 ms
__colors_default.css
154 ms
__colors_dark.css
144 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
163 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
185 ms
skin.css
251 ms
style.css
248 ms
trx_addons.responsive.css
248 ms
responsive.css
250 ms
skin-responsive.css
249 ms
jquery.min.js
258 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
258 ms
v4-shims.min.js
258 ms
css
97 ms
pubads_impl.js
63 ms
fontawesome.min.css
131 ms
brands.min.css
356 ms
chart.min.js
132 ms
superfish.min.js
136 ms
index.js
134 ms
index.js
136 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.js
143 ms
front-end-free.js
144 ms
swiper.min.js
157 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
146 ms
trx_addons.js
156 ms
setupad-html-insertion.js
159 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
349 ms
frontend.min.js
347 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
159 ms
pwaforwp-video.js
343 ms
pwaforwp-download.js
344 ms
pwa-register-sw.js
342 ms
__scripts.js
343 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
343 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
332 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
481 ms
core.min.js
322 ms
tabs.min.js
322 ms
effect.min.js
317 ms
effect-fade.min.js
300 ms
forms.js
247 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
236 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
237 ms
waypoints.min.js
237 ms
frontend.min.js
233 ms
subscribe.jpg
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
207 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
278 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
278 ms
DewXAiKGIjI2Nf5AbGnRwMHAzJBRsZWJ02MTAyaIEYm7mYGDkgLD4GMIvNaRfTAaA0J5DN7rSLwQHCZmZw2ajC2BEYscGhI2Ijc4rLRjUQbxdHAwMji0NHckgESEkkEGzmYWLk0drB+L91A0vvRiYGFwAMdiP0AAA=
10 ms
fontello.svg
202 ms
jost-500-medium-webfont.woff
272 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58i-xDwxUD22FA.woff
272 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58i-xDwxUD22FA.woff
272 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58i-xDwxUD22FA.woff
272 ms
QAAA==
8 ms
trx_addons_icons.svg
196 ms
iframe_api
152 ms
bannerTag_WebsiteLogoTop.png
141 ms
top_mobile_ad_sizes-370x208.png
142 ms
bannertag.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bannertag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bannertag.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bannertag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bannertag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bannertag.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BannerTag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: