3.1 sec in total
145 ms
2.3 sec
672 ms
Click here to check amazing Banter And Charm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about banterandcharm.com
The custom letterpress wedding invitation you've been searching for is waiting for you. Tired of scrolling endlessly, searching for a wedding invitation?
Visit banterandcharm.comWe analyzed Banterandcharm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
banterandcharm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.58
11/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
145 ms
270 ms
62 ms
140 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Banterandcharm.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Banterandcharm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 117.4 kB (2%)
5.4 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Banterandcharm.com main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Banter And Charm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)
80
37
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Banter And Charm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
banterandcharm.com
145 ms
banterandcharm.com
270 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
62 ms
style.css
140 ms
style.min.css
169 ms
css
44 ms
simple-banner.css
161 ms
font-awesome.css
174 ms
frontend.css
171 ms
testimonial-rotator-style.css
158 ms
font-awesome.min.css
193 ms
ionicons.min.css
214 ms
dashicons.min.css
226 ms
slick.css
231 ms
front-end.css
220 ms
style.css
226 ms
gca-column-styles.css
246 ms
style-front.css
270 ms
style.css
278 ms
jquery.min.js
286 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
284 ms
simple-banner.js
285 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
300 ms
jquery.cycletwo.js
325 ms
jquery.cycletwo.addons.js
402 ms
global.js
401 ms
home.js
1001 ms
js
78 ms
soliloquy.css
489 ms
frontend.js
401 ms
stickThis.js
487 ms
fadeup.js
487 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
487 ms
matchheight-init.js
488 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
495 ms
slick.min.js
1121 ms
slick-init.js
1072 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
494 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
1124 ms
soliloquy-min.js
631 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
576 ms
9b718a27164abfe59cc4cfb938e656d9
139 ms
bg.jpg
499 ms
sbi-sprite.png
359 ms
border.png
402 ms
symbol-defs.svg
467 ms
cropped-BanterAndCharm_Logo_header.jpg
523 ms
Blind-letterpress-bg.jpeg
885 ms
bridebouquet2-bg.jpg
898 ms
Notre-Dame-Wedding-Invitation-bg-scaled.jpg
945 ms
GoldFoil_slider-1560x520-1.jpg
916 ms
couple-bg.jpg
1199 ms
bride-holding-invitation-scaled.jpg
1034 ms
Bronx-Zoo-Venue-Illustration-Wedding-Invitations-300x300.jpg
947 ms
TPC-Sawgrass_Wedding-Invitations-300x300.jpg
963 ms
Venue-illustration-vellum-folder-wedding-invitation-300x300.jpg
983 ms
Tuscan-wedding-invitation-suite-300x300.jpg
1005 ms
Turtle-Creek-Park-Wedding-Invitations-300x300.jpg
1009 ms
Black-Letterpress-Wedding-Invitation-with-venue-sketch-envelope-liner-300x300.jpg
1018 ms
banterandcharm.jpg
1052 ms
placeholder.png
1068 ms
universal.js
187 ms
utm.gif
127 ms
sec-nav.png
1017 ms
PinkCollage3_bg.jpg
1149 ms
BlackEnvelopes_bg.jpg
1220 ms
js
110 ms
analytics.js
159 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
105 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
158 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
208 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
220 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
220 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
219 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
219 ms
co3bmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjYqXtP.ttf
218 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQAllfvg-N.ttf
251 ms
wARDj0u
4 ms
preloader.gif
970 ms
left.png
972 ms
right.png
970 ms
circle.png
1024 ms
circle-hover.png
1025 ms
pause.png
1029 ms
play.png
1077 ms
video.png
1077 ms
collect
67 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
67 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
989 ms
fontawesome.woff
1258 ms
collect
59 ms
427898074_288568007346296_8770216377885746536_nlow.jpg
438 ms
427923428_3069737303159956_3436796281592760930_nlow.jpg
470 ms
425243523_320291164325361_2114221037661413435_nlow.jpg
467 ms
424627718_1742326866275182_5841865037251673775_nlow.jpg
496 ms
422779679_392544563424774_8219142714476542321_nlow.jpg
507 ms
422783172_2044222202607482_3608707308764355286_nlow.jpg
507 ms
420657428_348740041423954_3313256303445349954_nlow.jpg
525 ms
405257577_357192776988669_3119219964940643504_nlow.jpg
533 ms
banterandcharm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
banterandcharm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
banterandcharm.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Banterandcharm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Banterandcharm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
banterandcharm.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Banter And Charm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: