Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

batteryfaq.org screenshot

About Website

Visit batteryfaq.org now to see the best up-to-date Batteryfaq content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about batteryfaq.org

Battery consumer information and answers to frequently asked questions (FAQ) about car and deep cycle batteries.

Visit batteryfaq.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Batteryfaq.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

batteryfaq.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

batteryfaq.org

1187 ms

254 ms

battery.css

145 ms

Eurobat.jpg

367 ms

valid-html401.gif

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Batteryfaq.org, 80% (4 requests) were made to Jgdarden.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Batteryfaq.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 kB (10%)

Content Size

32.8 kB

After Optimization

29.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Batteryfaq.org main page is 32.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 29.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 324 B

  • Original 748 B
  • After minification 702 B
  • After compression 424 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 324 B or 43% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 595 B

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Batteryfaq images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 504 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Batteryfaq.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Batteryfaq. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

batteryfaq.org accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

batteryfaq.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

batteryfaq.org SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Batteryfaq.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Batteryfaq.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Batteryfaq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: