Tools & Wizards About Us
beatlesagain.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

beatlesagain.com

The Beatles - The Internet Beatles Album

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

163 ms

beatlesagain.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to beatlesagain.com homepage info - get ready to check Beatles Again best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about beatlesagain.com

A collection of Beatles related informational, sound and picture files, made available for study by Beatles fans and scholars all over the world to explore the behind-the-scenes details of Beatlemania...

Visit beatlesagain.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beatlesagain.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beatlesagain.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beatlesagain.com

142 ms

www.beatlesagain.com

269 ms

style.css

93 ms

apply.js

94 ms

flat.js

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Beatlesagain.com, 19% (4 requests) were made to Walrusmedia.com and 14% (3 requests) were made to Assoc-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) relates to the external source Rover.ebay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.3 kB (45%)

Content Size

58.3 kB

After Optimization

32.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beatlesagain.com main page is 58.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 24.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beatles Again images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 999 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beatlesagain.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beatles Again. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beatlesagain.com

beatlesagain.com

142 ms

www.beatlesagain.com

www.beatlesagain.com

269 ms

style.css

style.css

93 ms

apply.js

apply.js

94 ms

flat.js

flat.js

64 ms

menustyle.css

menustyle.css

88 ms

menu.js

menu.js

96 ms

wma.cgi

wma.cgi

832 ms

wma.cgi

wma.cgi

1121 ms

newimproved.gif

newimproved.gif

62 ms

1x1.gif

1x1.gif

71 ms

ibaslug.gif

ibaslug.gif

72 ms

nociggie.jpg

nociggie.jpg

78 ms

yesterdayandtoday.gif

yesterdayandtoday.gif

61 ms

uparrow.gif

uparrow.gif

713 ms

ir

ir

10 ms

1

1

6222 ms

wma.gif

wma.gif

48 ms

ir

ir

7 ms

ir

ir

7 ms

wma.gif

wma.gif

42 ms

Accessibility Review

beatlesagain.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

beatlesagain.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

beatlesagain.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beatlesagain.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Beatlesagain.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

beatlesagain.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beatles Again. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: