3.9 sec in total
327 ms
2.8 sec
760 ms
Visit beauty.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Beauty content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beauty.org.uk
Beauty therapist offering treatments inc Eve Taylor facials, Massages, Mum to be treatments, Callus foot peels, Gel nails, Waxing, LashLifts, Extensions & more.
Visit beauty.org.ukWe analyzed Beauty.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
beauty.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value23.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,460 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
327 ms
701 ms
173 ms
266 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beauty.org.uk, 86% (56 requests) were made to Beautyescape.co.uk and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Beautyescape.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 118.9 kB (2%)
6.2 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Beauty.org.uk main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 983 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beauty.org.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beauty.org.uk
327 ms
www.beautyescape.co.uk
701 ms
i95u.css
173 ms
i95u.css
266 ms
i95u.css
261 ms
css
36 ms
i95u.css
270 ms
i95u.css
273 ms
i95u.js
269 ms
i95u.js
460 ms
i95u.css
346 ms
stickThis.js
350 ms
comment-reply.min.js
351 ms
superfish.js
348 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
355 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
432 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
434 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
433 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
554 ms
jquery.isotope.js
446 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
551 ms
jquery.stapel.js
552 ms
scripts.js
552 ms
retina.js
554 ms
complianz.min.js
573 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
631 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
632 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
632 ms
mailcheck.min.js
632 ms
punycode.min.js
636 ms
utils.min.js
647 ms
wpforms.min.js
726 ms
api.js
68 ms
sbi-sprite.png
224 ms
Beauty-Therapy-1-1920x850.jpg
548 ms
Beauty-Therapy-4-1920x850.jpg
551 ms
Beauty-Therapy-2-1920x850.jpg
475 ms
hands-featured-1-750x500.jpg
243 ms
eyes-featured-1-750x500.jpg
389 ms
facials-featured-1-750x500.jpg
475 ms
Pedicure-featured-1-750x500.jpg
378 ms
Massages-featured-1-750x500.jpg
423 ms
Waxing-featured-1-750x500.jpg
475 ms
Daniella-4-scaled.jpg
776 ms
Shepherds-Hut.jpg
1252 ms
ChIJE1IU3X7D2UcRIdq4KX_kKYI.jpg
651 ms
powered_by_google_on_non_white.png
563 ms
guest.png
631 ms
default-minimal.jpg
635 ms
Muddy-Awards.png
649 ms
Beauty-Escape.png
725 ms
placeholder.png
723 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
25 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
56 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
79 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
93 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
94 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
772 ms
recaptcha__en.js
81 ms
441267635_343790671649244_2096484780387129035_nthumb.jpg
551 ms
427561637_425204619942683_963199311158113462_nthumb.jpg
432 ms
419914006_1204730127581173_934748424747128513_nthumb.jpg
434 ms
413947807_886561336458776_5494313612921624881_nthumb.jpg
488 ms
411005869_2298823916981558_4669615581752670668_nthumb.jpg
516 ms
408447783_379946847807390_8950568921564475201_nthumb.jpg
517 ms
beauty.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
beauty.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
beauty.org.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beauty.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beauty.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beauty.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: