Tools & Wizards About Us
beautybeat.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

beautybeat.co

Domain Names | Buy, Sell, Lease, Trade | Host Much

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

beautybeat.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Beautybeat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautybeat.co

Need a great domain name for your business? Browse our list for instant purchase. Don't see what your looking for? Allow our web managers to help you find the right name and negotiate on your behalf.

Visit beautybeat.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautybeat.co page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautybeat.co performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,070 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.327

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautybeat.co

13 ms

domains

456 ms

css

41 ms

css2

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautybeat.co, 77% (40 requests) were made to Hostmuch.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (540 ms) relates to the external source Hostmuch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (72%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

625.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautybeat.co main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 44.8 kB

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 228.0 kB
  • After minification 228.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautybeat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 541.5 kB

  • Original 762.5 kB
  • After minification 762.0 kB
  • After compression 221.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 541.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 996.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 163.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybeat.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 996.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautybeat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautybeat.co

beautybeat.co

13 ms

domains

domains

456 ms

css

css

41 ms

css2

css2

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

297 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

356 ms

animate.compat.css

animate.compat.css

304 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

181 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

181 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

182 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

241 ms

theme.css

theme.css

481 ms

theme-elements.css

theme-elements.css

525 ms

theme-blog.css

theme-blog.css

305 ms

theme-shop.css

theme-shop.css

359 ms

component.css

component.css

360 ms

default.css

default.css

540 ms

custom.css

custom.css

414 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

415 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

57 ms

js

js

83 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

527 ms

theme.js

theme.js

527 ms

jquery.flipshow.min.js

jquery.flipshow.min.js

360 ms

view.home.js

view.home.js

424 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

527 ms

logo.png

logo.png

72 ms

host-much-coin.png

host-much-coin.png

72 ms

domain-for-sale.jpg

domain-for-sale.jpg

73 ms

blog-11.jpg

blog-11.jpg

73 ms

blog-24.jpg

blog-24.jpg

95 ms

blog-42.jpg

blog-42.jpg

95 ms

logo-black.png

logo-black.png

174 ms

office-db.webp

office-db.webp

173 ms

office-reno.webp

office-reno.webp

173 ms

office-lv.webp

office-lv.webp

173 ms

hostmuch-thin.webp

hostmuch-thin.webp

173 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

78 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

179 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

193 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

195 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

194 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

193 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

192 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

192 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

166 ms

office-db.webp

office-db.webp

123 ms

office-reno.webp

office-reno.webp

121 ms

office-lv.webp

office-lv.webp

124 ms

hostmuch-thin.webp

hostmuch-thin.webp

123 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

69 ms

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

22 ms

Accessibility Review

beautybeat.co accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

beautybeat.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beautybeat.co SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybeat.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautybeat.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautybeat.co

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautybeat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: