2.7 sec in total
547 ms
1.6 sec
604 ms
Welcome to beautycook.net homepage info - get ready to check Beautycook best content right away, or after learning these important things about beautycook.net
Visit beautycook.netWe analyzed Beautycook.net page load time and found that the first response time was 547 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Beautycook.net rating and web reputation
beautycook.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
547 ms
490 ms
329 ms
354 ms
360 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Beautycook.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (695 ms) belongs to the original domain Beautycook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 576.8 kB (38%)
1.5 MB
942.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautycook.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 861.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beautycook needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 410.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautycook.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)
32
11
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautycook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautycook.net
547 ms
default.css
490 ms
skin.css
329 ms
container.css
354 ms
portal.css
360 ms
module.css
425 ms
ComboBox.Default.css
339 ms
jquery.min.js
590 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
666 ms
css
25 ms
superfish.css
416 ms
WebResource.axd
451 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
568 ms
dnn.js
509 ms
ControlPanel.debug.js
680 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
520 ms
dnn.jquery.js
584 ms
dnnactions.debug.js
679 ms
dnncore.js
591 ms
dnn.modalpopup.js
679 ms
skin.css
695 ms
initWidgets.js
637 ms
ga.js
76 ms
oh-hello.png
130 ms
shopnowbutton.png
338 ms
painted%20ingredient%20background%20with%20blue-01-01-01.jpg
399 ms
mini-header.png
195 ms
facebook.gif
140 ms
twitter.gif
142 ms
pinterest.gif
77 ms
hoverIntent.js
76 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
superfish.js
70 ms
DotNetNukeAjaxShared.js
77 ms
beautycook.net accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
beautycook.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
beautycook.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautycook.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Beautycook.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautycook.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautycook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: