Access beautyjudge.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

beautyjudge.com

292 ms

www.glamgeek.co.uk

606 ms

jquery.js

389 ms

jquery.migrate.js

156 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js

338 ms

Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautyjudge.com, 52% (73 requests) were made to Glamgeek.co.uk and 18% (26 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) relates to the external source Glamgeek.co.uk.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Beautyjudge.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 945.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

Original 96.3 kB
After minification 62.5 kB
After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.8 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

Original 945.3 kB
After minification 914.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautyjudge images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 353.3 kB

Original 485.9 kB
After minification 413.3 kB
After compression 132.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 172.4 kB

Original 208.4 kB
After minification 194.6 kB
After compression 36.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyjudge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

136

After Optimization

The browser has sent 136 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautyjudge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyjudge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Beautyjudge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautyjudge.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautyjudge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

beautyjudge.com

www.glamgeek.co.uk

jquery.js

jquery.migrate.js

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

beautyjudge.com

www.glamgeek.co.uk

jquery.js

jquery.migrate.js

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js

ui.core.min.js

ui.stars.js

jquery.simplemodal-1.3.5.min.js

jquery.NobleCount.js

jquery.jgrowl.js

swfobject.js

jquery.uploadify.v2.1.0.min.js

glamgeek.js

common.js

data.js

master.js

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.js

default.css

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

crystal-stars.css

uploadify.css

css

css

font-awesome.min.css

accountcontrol.js

productlist.js

index.js

twiiter40x40.png

3.jpg

2.jpg

11.jpg

4.jpg

7.jpg

9.jpg

10.jpg

12.jpg

5.jpg

17.jpg

25.jpg

30.jpg

32.jpg

41.jpg