Tools & Wizards About Us
beautystatement.be screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

beautystatement.be

BeautyStatement.be - Onze top selectie Beauty producten!

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

220 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

beautystatement.be screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Beauty Statement content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautystatement.be

Lippenstift, Oogschaduw of Parfum nodig? Bij Beauty Statement vind je een geweldige selectie makeup en verzorgingsartikelen van merken als Beautyblender, Eyelene, SenceBeauty

Visit beautystatement.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautystatement.be page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautystatement.be performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautystatement.be

220 ms

www.restatement.be

644 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

87 ms

front.css

170 ms

style.css

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautystatement.be, 51% (36 requests) were made to Restatement.be and 13% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) relates to the external source Restatement.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 787.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautystatement.be main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 187.2 kB

  • Original 258.1 kB
  • After minification 254.9 kB
  • After compression 70.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Statement images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 418.5 kB

  • Original 706.7 kB
  • After minification 666.3 kB
  • After compression 288.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 418.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 120.3 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautystatement.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (54%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Statement. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautystatement.be

beautystatement.be

220 ms

www.restatement.be

www.restatement.be

644 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

87 ms

front.css

front.css

170 ms

style.css

style.css

168 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

170 ms

css

css

28 ms

css

css

40 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

170 ms

options.css

options.css

173 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

173 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

339 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

252 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

24 ms

element.js

element.js

31 ms

AlpinePhotoTiles_style.css

AlpinePhotoTiles_style.css

248 ms

front.js

front.js

249 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

250 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

251 ms

custom.js

custom.js

333 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

334 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

331 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

333 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

339 ms

AlpinePhotoTiles_script.js

AlpinePhotoTiles_script.js

416 ms

style.css

style.css

260 ms

ga.js

ga.js

25 ms

badge1.png

badge1.png

89 ms

12798005_1162156000484454_357291797_n.jpg

12798005_1162156000484454_357291797_n.jpg

457 ms

small-logo.png

small-logo.png

89 ms

logo_8.png

logo_8.png

260 ms

loccitane-3.jpg

loccitane-3.jpg

697 ms

budapest_todo_24.jpg

budapest_todo_24.jpg

698 ms

woonboek_1.jpg

woonboek_1.jpg

457 ms

lower-ribbon-about.png

lower-ribbon-about.png

106 ms

IMG_3266.jpg

IMG_3266.jpg

626 ms

lolo-3.jpg

lolo-3.jpg

871 ms

zolder-5.jpg

zolder-5.jpg

698 ms

waffles-2.jpg

waffles-2.jpg

915 ms

hauschka-3.jpg

hauschka-3.jpg

958 ms

chuck-1.jpg

chuck-1.jpg

918 ms

logo_b.png

logo_b.png

747 ms

12819155_965863210168070_641796727_n.jpg

12819155_965863210168070_641796727_n.jpg

484 ms

1515484_989555124467701_2089399100_n.jpg

1515484_989555124467701_2089399100_n.jpg

559 ms

12818970_1570949766556610_916912853_n.jpg

12818970_1570949766556610_916912853_n.jpg

595 ms

1173218_941651885930994_1767910599_n.jpg

1173218_941651885930994_1767910599_n.jpg

567 ms

916378_560053424162866_1383789728_n.jpg

916378_560053424162866_1383789728_n.jpg

564 ms

12826117_1148774308486874_1368980456_n.jpg

12826117_1148774308486874_1368980456_n.jpg

566 ms

12328229_1071010042938335_1774225544_n.jpg

12328229_1071010042938335_1774225544_n.jpg

559 ms

12826068_993443474075409_414747769_n.jpg

12826068_993443474075409_414747769_n.jpg

634 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

816 ms

rL_b2ND61EQmMOJ8CRr1fi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

rL_b2ND61EQmMOJ8CRr1fi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

70 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

63 ms

main.js

main.js

79 ms

count.js

count.js

201 ms

zara-list-icon.png

zara-list-icon.png

599 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

194 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

89 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

32 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

48 ms

count-data.js

count-data.js

133 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

30 ms

l

l

43 ms

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

23 ms

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

12 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

38 ms

te_ctrl3.gif

te_ctrl3.gif

16 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

21 ms

te_bk.gif

te_bk.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

beautystatement.be accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

beautystatement.be best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

beautystatement.be SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautystatement.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Beautystatement.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautystatement.be

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty Statement. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: