5.5 sec in total
160 ms
4.7 sec
675 ms
Click here to check amazing Benchmark Print content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about benchmarkprint.net
Benchmark Signaats has been printing in Brooklyn since 1982. It is a Minority Women Owned Business (MWBE). We can do offset, digital, and custom. (718) 522-6401
Visit benchmarkprint.netWe analyzed Benchmarkprint.net page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
benchmarkprint.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value2,690 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
160 ms
59 ms
108 ms
108 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Benchmarkprint.net, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Benchmarkprint.net.
Page size can be reduced by 3.3 MB (11%)
30.8 MB
27.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Benchmarkprint.net main page is 30.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 30.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benchmark Print images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benchmarkprint.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (65%)
72
25
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benchmark Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
benchmarkprint.net
160 ms
style.min.css
59 ms
styles.css
108 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
108 ms
frontend.css
112 ms
public-main.css
108 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
113 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
161 ms
woocommerce.css
162 ms
fonts.css
163 ms
style.css
165 ms
responsive.css
163 ms
pum-site-styles.css
174 ms
jquery.min.js
221 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
215 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.2.min.js
216 ms
frontend.js
219 ms
public-main.js
219 ms
tracker.js
233 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
271 ms
owl.carousel.css
287 ms
sa-owl-theme.css
287 ms
animate.min.css
288 ms
lightgallery.css
288 ms
lightgallery-bundle.min.css
289 ms
index.js
333 ms
index.js
332 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
332 ms
nivo-lightbox.js
331 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
331 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
338 ms
custom.js
386 ms
core.min.js
389 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
388 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
388 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
386 ms
owl.carousel2.thumbs.min.js
346 ms
lightgallery.min.js
375 ms
lg-video.min.js
347 ms
lg-zoom.min.js
375 ms
lg-autoplay.min.js
369 ms
player.min.js
368 ms
css
21 ms
wall-background-1481542063jfv.jpg
1583 ms
bgheader.jpg
670 ms
header-lg-sizeMarch-2022.jpg
338 ms
Featuring-BSN-clients.png
1275 ms
Cling-01.png
3246 ms
3-Books_Slider.png
4255 ms
Hablamos-07-27-22.png
1005 ms
Product-labels-08-01-22.png
3092 ms
Postcard_new-slider-1.png
1323 ms
Banners-Slider.png
1537 ms
Brochures-slider-1.png
1481 ms
Business-card-new-2020-2.png
2104 ms
Synthetic-papers-slide-v2_Synthetic-papers-slider.png
1695 ms
Foamcore-sign-04-01-1.png
2866 ms
Trade-Show-slider.png
1842 ms
Cert-MWBE-300x57.png
1897 ms
Thanksgiving-pop-up.png
2088 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
38 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
38 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
37 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
37 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
38 ms
Bpv9woSULkk
130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2106 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
29 ms
base.js
108 ms
bx_loader.gif
1901 ms
controls.png
1954 ms
Bpv9woSULkk
88 ms
base.js
34 ms
nML6sO0rp_owOkRMsF5s0qJry7DmnW_dXxSd8CRnFU8.js
88 ms
embed.js
45 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
145 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
146 ms
Create
131 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
log_event
25 ms
benchmarkprint.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
benchmarkprint.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
benchmarkprint.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benchmarkprint.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Benchmarkprint.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
benchmarkprint.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Benchmark Print. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: