1.4 sec in total
162 ms
1.1 sec
191 ms
Click here to check amazing Bestbuybabymonitor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestbuybabymonitor.com
Find the best baby monitor that meet your needs and budget using our comparison matrix based on price, specification, features and customer review and rating
Visit bestbuybabymonitor.comWe analyzed Bestbuybabymonitor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
bestbuybabymonitor.com performance score
162 ms
78 ms
75 ms
25 ms
180 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Bestbuybabymonitor.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Wan.travel and 9% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 465.5 kB (52%)
895.5 kB
430.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestbuybabymonitor.com main page is 895.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 468.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestbuybabymonitor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 281.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestbuybabymonitor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (46%)
48
26
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestbuybabymonitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestbuybabymonitor.com
162 ms
dYzdDoMwCIVfSIJ7pLZiJaHSFIzu7Tc7za68gZzv_IyYtEQtIaP5W2h44cQ5w3kwmXXVyW0bKQRptbsmPFHUA4Tz4sP4XxOOaKlx9W9qq9RmtgUKrduveKOnjocYqV3vKTTr6mEn00J99dRwgQ8.css
78 ms
NcpRCoAgDADQE7Ul_XUbk6ET56xNqNsHQb-PV9zHjhhrvCGr5kZxsEFS-QwbH4b1nHQ9kzFAWGFDLyRkaKLqpZP9Y5kMwh2S2Qs.css
75 ms
css
25 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzdAz1i1PzdRNzigr0s4r1i3MyU1KT8isA.js
180 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
css
34 ms
datepicker.css
71 ms
searchbox.css
96 ms
searchbox.js
150 ms
lYtBCgIxDEUv1JoRvFDTxjGDaUrSIHh6FQRdOAtX7_N5b4GqgiplhSsjeDUe00G0kXW-22el5bc6CyLZG3uSxyA7s1-yUA_Yvp4_Ew_0vaSGT5V0BKMWlTJq9CesTHr1a9k8neA2MglSOwj3Bw.js
108 ms
q
36 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
cm
149 ms
4165bOZsUtL._SL160_SL150_.jpg
144 ms
c26-B0069JBKHI-1-s.jpg
147 ms
ECO_DECT_Monitor_Philips_AVENT_6-10-13_3_sm.jpg
142 ms
51B-bCcv0LL._SL250_.jpg
146 ms
ir
142 ms
grey-icon.png
227 ms
ui-icons_222222_256x240.png
94 ms
v_172130.gif
282 ms
41vgGji-AcL._SL160_SL150_.jpg
84 ms
41GEBo-tRYL._SL160_SL150_.jpg
225 ms
wego.png
217 ms
arrow-down.png
217 ms
comment.png
224 ms
rss.png
223 ms
facebook.png
224 ms
twitter.png
223 ms
fbody.png
278 ms
close.gif
278 ms
ca-pub-2619256836381657.js
275 ms
zrt_lookup.html
275 ms
show_ads_impl.js
215 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
188 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
245 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
248 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
248 ms
41zZkjkuf-L._SL250_.jpg
197 ms
200 ms
25082_babyregistry_assoc2_728x90._V311067783_.jpg
193 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
94 ms
ads
288 ms
osd.js
25 ms
ads
260 ms
1732526697616821108
77 ms
abg.js
33 ms
m_js_controller.js
31 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
76 ms
502485695172883546
73 ms
s
30 ms
x_button_blue2.png
12 ms
bestbuybabymonitor.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestbuybabymonitor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bestbuybabymonitor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestbuybabymonitor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestbuybabymonitor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: