2.7 sec in total
199 ms
1.7 sec
751 ms
Welcome to bestchoicewaterproofing.com homepage info - get ready to check Bestchoice Waterproofing best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestchoicewaterproofing.com
Looking for best basement waterproofing contractors? Best Choice Waterproofing offers advanced basement masters waterproofing solution for your damp problems.
Visit bestchoicewaterproofing.comWe analyzed Bestchoicewaterproofing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bestchoicewaterproofing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
199 ms
354 ms
389 ms
386 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Bestchoicewaterproofing.com, 14% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (771 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestchoicewaterproofing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 229.3 kB (22%)
1.1 MB
827.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestchoicewaterproofing.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 595.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestchoice Waterproofing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 77 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestchoicewaterproofing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (57%)
74
32
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestchoice Waterproofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestchoicewaterproofing.com
199 ms
bestchoicewaterproofing.com
354 ms
main.min.css
389 ms
styles.css
386 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
164 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
388 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
389 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
442 ms
swiper.min.css
218 ms
post-8.css
272 ms
global.css
328 ms
post-11.css
382 ms
frontend.css
437 ms
post-394.css
436 ms
style.css
441 ms
css
29 ms
fontawesome.min.css
446 ms
brands.min.css
449 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
495 ms
content.css
470 ms
slider-pager-buttons.css
470 ms
galleries.min.css
471 ms
frontend.min.js
524 ms
index.js
530 ms
index.js
528 ms
jquery.min.js
645 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
529 ms
jquery-actual.min.js
528 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
658 ms
underscore.min.js
657 ms
verge.min.js
661 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
662 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
643 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
757 ms
hooks.min.js
756 ms
i18n.min.js
771 ms
jquery-strongslider.min.js
754 ms
controller.min.js
753 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
753 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
662 ms
waypoints.min.js
657 ms
core.min.js
603 ms
frontend.min.js
551 ms
gtm.js
158 ms
fbevents.js
121 ms
logo.png
426 ms
hero-banner.jpg
569 ms
form-book-logo.png
387 ms
made-in-usa.png
441 ms
pease-of-mind.png
459 ms
elite.png
460 ms
top-rated.png
460 ms
feature-pro.png
461 ms
background-checked.png
494 ms
Home-Advidor.png
512 ms
Buildzoom.png
491 ms
7cHpv4kjgoGqM7E_DMs_.woff
143 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3_-gs51oq.woff
144 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3p-ks51oq.woff
215 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3w-os51oq.woff
236 ms
7cHrv4kjgoGqM7E3b_s7wHk.woff
236 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E30-8s51oq.woff
236 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s51oq.woff
237 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3q-0s51oq.woff
236 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3j-ws51oq.woff
234 ms
tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9Q.woff
238 ms
tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff
237 ms
time-icon.png
469 ms
setting-icon.png
468 ms
flag-icon.png
486 ms
lock-icon.png
471 ms
tDbN2oWUg0MKqSIg75Tp.woff
166 ms
tDbO2oWUg0MKqSIoVLH68dr5.woff
164 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
523 ms
gauranteed-icon.png
466 ms
parcentage-icon.png
466 ms
waterproofing.png
497 ms
img-02.png
484 ms
js
64 ms
img-01.png
403 ms
img-03.png
391 ms
img-04.png
424 ms
foundation-rapair.png
425 ms
crawl-repair.png
438 ms
Space-insulation.png
421 ms
sump-pumps.png
348 ms
map-images.jpg
348 ms
cards-imges.png
348 ms
testimonial.jpg
416 ms
quotes.png
379 ms
bestchoicewaterproofing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bestchoicewaterproofing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bestchoicewaterproofing.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestchoicewaterproofing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestchoicewaterproofing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestchoicewaterproofing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestchoice Waterproofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: