Tools & Wizards About Us
bestlifecam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

bestlifecam.com

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

985 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

445 ms

bestlifecam.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bestlifecam content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestlifecam.com

Visit bestlifecam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestlifecam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 985 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestlifecam.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestlifecam.com

985 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

16 ms

tipTip.css

19 ms

form-builder.css

16 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Bestlifecam.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestlifecam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 958.9 kB (48%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestlifecam.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 817.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 53.3 kB

  • Original 72.7 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 817.9 kB
  • After minification 803.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestlifecam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 338.5 kB

  • Original 467.1 kB
  • After minification 418.8 kB
  • After compression 128.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 553.0 kB

  • Original 625.1 kB
  • After minification 560.5 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestlifecam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 553.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (67%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestlifecam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestlifecam.com

bestlifecam.com

985 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

16 ms

tipTip.css

tipTip.css

19 ms

form-builder.css

form-builder.css

16 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

17 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

36 ms

wc-quantity-increment.css

wc-quantity-increment.css

19 ms

css

css

51 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

css

css

78 ms

style.css

style.css

18 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

18 ms

f7style.css

f7style.css

21 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

23 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

28 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

51 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

31 ms

jquery.tipTip.minified.js

jquery.tipTip.minified.js

29 ms

admin-tiptip-min.js

admin-tiptip-min.js

30 ms

jquery.waitforimages.min.js

jquery.waitforimages.min.js

33 ms

jquery.prettyembed.min.js

jquery.prettyembed.min.js

40 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

34 ms

wc-quantity-increment.min.js

wc-quantity-increment.min.js

39 ms

fixed.js

fixed.js

36 ms

getSeal

getSeal

477 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

35 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

36 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

35 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

38 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

37 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

39 ms

jquery.uniform.min.js

jquery.uniform.min.js

37 ms

custom.js

custom.js

40 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

39 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

37 ms

custom.js

custom.js

41 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

40 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

39 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

41 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

64 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

37 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

9 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

41 ms

bestlifecam-logo.png

bestlifecam-logo.png

32 ms

2-banner-home-hpcam.png

2-banner-home-hpcam.png

34 ms

1-home-right-hpcam1.jpg

1-home-right-hpcam1.jpg

31 ms

red-selfie-Copy1.jpg

red-selfie-Copy1.jpg

33 ms

dog.jpg

dog.jpg

32 ms

time-lapse-Copy-e1441248278617.jpg

time-lapse-Copy-e1441248278617.jpg

33 ms

HP201505284831.png

HP201505284831.png

35 ms

HP201505284811.png

HP201505284811.png

564 ms

HP201505284771.png

HP201505284771.png

37 ms

dashboard-Copy.jpg

dashboard-Copy.jpg

34 ms

window-girl.jpg

window-girl.jpg

33 ms

wide-angle-Copy-e1441250790717.jpg

wide-angle-Copy-e1441250790717.jpg

36 ms

blue-selfie.jpg

blue-selfie.jpg

34 ms

ec.js

ec.js

29 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

11 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

siteseal_gd_3_h_d_m.gif

siteseal_gd_3_h_d_m.gif

128 ms

bestlifecam.com

bestlifecam.com

639 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

38 ms

safe-standard.js

safe-standard.js

776 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

4 ms

Accessibility Review

bestlifecam.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

bestlifecam.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestlifecam.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestlifecam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bestlifecam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestlifecam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestlifecam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: