25.6 sec in total
318 ms
25.2 sec
110 ms
Visit bestonconstruction.com now to see the best up-to-date Bestonconstruction content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestonconstruction.com
Home
Visit bestonconstruction.comWe analyzed Bestonconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 25.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
bestonconstruction.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value4,930 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
318 ms
747 ms
731 ms
735 ms
684 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bestonconstruction.com, 31% (33 requests) were made to G.lazcdn.com and 20% (21 requests) were made to Lzd-img-global.slatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Tpsservice-files-inner.cn-hangzhou.oss-cdn.aliyun-inc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 491.8 kB (16%)
3.0 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Bestonconstruction.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 427.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 427.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestonconstruction images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestonconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (66%)
90
31
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestonconstruction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestonconstruction.com
318 ms
747 ms
pc.css
731 ms
pc-mod.css
735 ms
aplus_int.js
684 ms
803 ms
next.min.js
935 ms
802 ms
index.css
802 ms
index.js
846 ms
index.umd.es5.production.js
1036 ms
index.umd.es5.production.js
1166 ms
1035 ms
jssdk
996 ms
1108 ms
870 ms
869 ms
1002 ms
995 ms
1002 ms
index.js
498 ms
nc.js
68 ms
TB1Hs8GaMFY.1VjSZFnXXcFHXXa.png
633 ms
9174453f-455e-4e30-87d2-bd90239e6994.png
382 ms
logoan138.png
468 ms
7b17449b7b047a1f1a859a29ec996e97.png
46 ms
O1CN01RNizk522j2cPtaRjc_!!6000000007155-2-tps-96-70.png
1015 ms
TB1gNcMWBr0gK0jSZFnXXbRRXXa.png
641 ms
TB1Je4vhRr0gK0jSZFnXXbRRXXa.png
632 ms
TB1x8lvhHj1gK0jSZFuXXcrHpXa.png
644 ms
O1CN01Y8JAuA1pB4EhCiF0K_!!6000000005321-2-tps-96-70.png
1723 ms
O1CN01qvF2hw1lWoZrnGZev_!!6000000004827-2-tps-96-70.png
1829 ms
O1CN01DGonqR1H5qmpBI2hf_!!6000000000707-2-tps-96-70.png
1859 ms
O1CN01ENOAXK1UR05CB9iwA_!!6000000002513-2-tps-96-70.png
2016 ms
O1CN01mFypLB1jt8eRUFBC0_!!6000000004605-2-tps-96-70.png
1955 ms
O1CN011Ya3Kg1OSw3sg81tm_!!6000000001705-2-tps-96-70.png
1956 ms
O1CN019tUhkL1abQnOURPrd_!!6000000003348-2-tps-96-70.png
1956 ms
O1CN01uOZizA1UOFhot1z5u_!!6000000002507-2-tps-96-70.png
1983 ms
TB1lbmoqYr1gK0jSZR0XXbP8XXa-340-200.png
1996 ms
TB1jyJMv.H1gK0jSZSyXXXtlpXa-184-120.png
2094 ms
O1CN01Wdetn224xMIRNihao_!!6000000007457-2-tps-34-34.png
2079 ms
O1CN01D6oQr31GPG1ONK9jd_!!6000000000614-2-tps-34-34.png
2081 ms
O1CN01zt1zOu1zsFnzoIWje_!!6000000006769-2-tps-34-34.png
2108 ms
O1CN01b9cK511pjsP40xyAX_!!6000000005397-2-tps-34-34.png
2150 ms
O1CN011gka8L1E0PIZlHK7e_!!6000000000289-2-tps-34-34.png
2141 ms
O1CN01bSHOIg1O2N9lO20XK_!!6000000001647-2-tps-34-34.png
2208 ms
O1CN0193C9ay1QIykTmUlwk_!!6000000001954-2-tps-34-34.png
2204 ms
O1CN01EShTwh1uKIMLn9AjA_!!6000000006018-0-tps-34-34.jpg
2218 ms
TB1nQJUcwmTBuNjy1XbXXaMrVXa-986-930.png
538 ms
TB1xEeTdBGw3KVjSZFDXXXWEpXa-75-66.png
663 ms
iconfont-hp.woff
787 ms
iconfont-hp.woff
787 ms
iconfont-hp.woff
128 ms
metaInfo.json
1537 ms
font_482437_i9tqljab236p3nmi.woff
1120 ms
alichat.js
163 ms
alichat.css
128 ms
bl.js
127 ms
132 ms
epssw.js
254 ms
getUser
1529 ms
et_n.js
238 ms
index.js
108 ms
rp
1738 ms
wcfg.json
1364 ms
fsp.1.1
918 ms
815 ms
index.js
805 ms
getUser
1373 ms
count
1373 ms
9dd6917e501f4144dd7af71009cceb63-1-1.png
20267 ms
1380 ms
info
54 ms
960 ms
punish
1020 ms
windvane.js
38 ms
htmltocanvas.min.js
83 ms
qrcode.min.js
41 ms
sufeiUtils.js
44 ms
52 ms
punish
284 ms
fsp.1.1
1196 ms
arms.1.1
1392 ms
fsp.1.1
1432 ms
main.css
126 ms
enterprise.js
35 ms
128 ms
index.js
130 ms
recaptcha__en.js
538 ms
O1CN01HwqYjp1FhI7bG5IBS_!!6000000000518-2-tps-344-108.png
576 ms
O1CN01iHwNQ923iPspr1n7H_!!6000000007289-0-tps-270-270.jpg
584 ms
info
503 ms
arms.1.2
222 ms
index.css
131 ms
index.js
280 ms
r.png
456 ms
r.png
678 ms
r.png
898 ms
r.png
900 ms
r.png
901 ms
r.png
901 ms
r.png
910 ms
r.png
914 ms
r.png
909 ms
r.png
903 ms
r.png
916 ms
r.png
1127 ms
bestonconstruction.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
bestonconstruction.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bestonconstruction.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
N/A
![]()
ID
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestonconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is . Our system also found out that Bestonconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestonconstruction.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestonconstruction. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: