Tools & Wizards About Us
bestonlinefax.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

bestonlinefax.com

Best Online Fax Services Comparison Platform - Bestonlinefax.com

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

bestonlinefax.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestonlinefax.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Online Fax best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestonlinefax.com

BestOnlineFax.com is created to eliminate the hassle of choosing an online fax service. We have provided a comparison chart that consists of the basic plans for each of the online fax companies.

Visit bestonlinefax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestonlinefax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestonlinefax.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestonlinefax.com

199 ms

www.bestonlinefax.com

463 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

style.min.css

173 ms

styles.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Bestonlinefax.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestonlinefax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

979.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestonlinefax.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 651.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

  • Original 88.6 kB
  • After minification 81.5 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 651.0 kB
  • After minification 622.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Online Fax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 208.1 kB
  • After minification 208.0 kB
  • After compression 200.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 152.1 kB
  • After minification 152.1 kB
  • After compression 142.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestonlinefax.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (67%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Online Fax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestonlinefax.com

bestonlinefax.com

199 ms

www.bestonlinefax.com

www.bestonlinefax.com

463 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

173 ms

styles.css

styles.css

182 ms

style.css

style.css

335 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

195 ms

style.css

style.css

199 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

354 ms

eggrehub.css

eggrehub.css

238 ms

css.css

css.css

242 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

259 ms

css

css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

264 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

302 ms

price_alert.js

price_alert.js

322 ms

js

js

148 ms

custom.js

custom.js

328 ms

map.js

map.js

383 ms

js

js

66 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

520 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

521 ms

css

css

18 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

520 ms

stopbadbots.js

stopbadbots.js

520 ms

custom.js

custom.js

524 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

521 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

522 ms

commentplus_re.js

commentplus_re.js

521 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

522 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

521 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

523 ms

bestOnlineFax-logo1.png

bestOnlineFax-logo1.png

131 ms

mac_app_new-1024x546.png

mac_app_new-1024x546.png

429 ms

70f83bfe-9f1f-465d-8123-6ac6e34e930a.png

70f83bfe-9f1f-465d-8123-6ac6e34e930a.png

131 ms

246x0w-300x300.jpg

246x0w-300x300.jpg

132 ms

myfax-300x169.png

myfax-300x169.png

132 ms

faxburner_signup-300x226.jpg

faxburner_signup-300x226.jpg

132 ms

eFax-Android-App-Review-1-300x222.jpg

eFax-Android-App-Review-1-300x222.jpg

212 ms

sep_home.png

sep_home.png

212 ms

Cloud-Fax-300x167.jpg

Cloud-Fax-300x167.jpg

213 ms

eFax-Services-300x157.png

eFax-Services-300x157.png

213 ms

Fax-Reviews-300x178.jpg

Fax-Reviews-300x178.jpg

215 ms

Online-Fax.jpg

Online-Fax.jpg

267 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

171 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf

82 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9.ttf

83 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf

84 ms

1Ptpg8fLXP2dlAXR-HlJJNJ_AtCe.ttf

1Ptpg8fLXP2dlAXR-HlJJNJ_AtCe.ttf

51 ms

Accessibility Review

bestonlinefax.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

bestonlinefax.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bestonlinefax.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestonlinefax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestonlinefax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestonlinefax.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Online Fax. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: