4.1 sec in total
359 ms
2.1 sec
1.6 sec
Welcome to besttopbeauty.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Top Beauty best content right away, or after learning these important things about besttopbeauty.com
Visit besttopbeauty.comWe analyzed Besttopbeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
besttopbeauty.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value940 ms
30/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
359 ms
244 ms
29 ms
38 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 154 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (153 requests) were addressed to the original Besttopbeauty.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Besttopbeauty.com.
Page size can be reduced by 247.2 kB (12%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Besttopbeauty.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Top Beauty images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Besttopbeauty.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 133 (87%)
153
20
The browser has sent 153 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Top Beauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 69 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
besttopbeauty.com
359 ms
wc-blocks.css
244 ms
mini-cart-contents.css
29 ms
packages-style.css
38 ms
mini-cart.css
34 ms
customer-account.css
229 ms
product-image.css
264 ms
product-button.css
234 ms
product-query.css
41 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
48 ms
common.min.css
54 ms
theme-light.min.css
74 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
active-filters.css
78 ms
add-to-cart-form.css
80 ms
all-products.css
87 ms
all-reviews.css
90 ms
attribute-filter.css
96 ms
breadcrumbs.css
111 ms
catalog-sorting.css
111 ms
featured-category.css
121 ms
featured-product.css
130 ms
price-filter.css
132 ms
product-add-to-cart.css
142 ms
product-categories.css
144 ms
product-gallery.css
152 ms
product-image-gallery.css
155 ms
product-template.css
179 ms
product-rating.css
166 ms
product-rating-stars.css
175 ms
product-results-count.css
188 ms
product-reviews.css
187 ms
product-sale-badge.css
199 ms
product-search.css
198 ms
product-sku.css
206 ms
product-stock-indicator.css
210 ms
css
43 ms
product-summary.css
208 ms
product-title.css
201 ms
rating-filter.css
205 ms
reviews-by-category.css
422 ms
reviews-by-product.css
200 ms
product-details.css
194 ms
single-product.css
191 ms
stock-filter.css
389 ms
order-confirmation-status.css
182 ms
order-confirmation-summary.css
381 ms
order-confirmation-totals.css
176 ms
order-confirmation-downloads.css
178 ms
order-confirmation-billing-address.css
174 ms
order-confirmation-shipping-address.css
400 ms
order-confirmation-additional-information.css
163 ms
order-confirmation-additional-fields-wrapper.css
173 ms
order-confirmation-additional-fields.css
161 ms
cart.css
172 ms
checkout.css
164 ms
style.css
165 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
169 ms
woocommerce.css
165 ms
woocommerce-blocktheme.css
168 ms
dashicons.min.css
166 ms
swatches.css
158 ms
style.css
164 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
159 ms
swiper.min.css
167 ms
post-3049.css
159 ms
all.min.css
171 ms
v4-shims.min.css
161 ms
post-95.css
170 ms
interactivity.min.js
164 ms
jquery.min.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
169 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
177 ms
js.cookie.min.js
170 ms
woocommerce.min.js
180 ms
underscore.min.js
177 ms
wp-util.min.js
186 ms
v4-shims.min.js
183 ms
email-decode.min.js
177 ms
view.min.js
183 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
181 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
182 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
189 ms
hooks.min.js
221 ms
i18n.min.js
180 ms
url.min.js
409 ms
api-fetch.min.js
382 ms
wc-settings.js
368 ms
price-format.js
168 ms
mini-cart-frontend.js
171 ms
lodash.min.js
235 ms
react.min.js
233 ms
deprecated.min.js
448 ms
dom.min.js
222 ms
react-dom.min.js
216 ms
escape-html.min.js
207 ms
element.min.js
204 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
203 ms
keycodes.min.js
185 ms
priority-queue.min.js
188 ms
compose.min.js
184 ms
private-apis.min.js
198 ms
redux-routine.min.js
190 ms
data.min.js
189 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
181 ms
data-controls.min.js
183 ms
html-entities.min.js
174 ms
notices.min.js
178 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
169 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
185 ms
wc-interactivity.js
182 ms
dom-ready.min.js
182 ms
a11y.min.js
178 ms
primitives.min.js
182 ms
warning.min.js
176 ms
product-button-interactivity-frontend.js
182 ms
scripts.js
178 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
190 ms
order-attribution.min.js
188 ms
main.js
184 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
175 ms
swatches.js
190 ms
core.min.js
114 ms
mouse.min.js
128 ms
draggable.min.js
126 ms
backbone.min.js
147 ms
backbone.marionette.min.js
449 ms
backbone.radio.min.js
146 ms
common-modules.min.js
435 ms
web-cli.min.js
538 ms
dialog.min.js
142 ms
api-request.min.js
144 ms
dev-tools.min.js
134 ms
common.min.js
145 ms
app-loader.min.js
151 ms
Logo.jpg
155 ms
wishlist.png
158 ms
skin-care.png
162 ms
hair-care.png
174 ms
body-care.png
168 ms
weight-loss.png
176 ms
makeup.png
161 ms
secret.png
169 ms
24k-goldzan-300x300.png
200 ms
Ginger-shampoo-300x300.png
201 ms
brilliant-skin-300x300.png
803 ms
Black-Soap-300x300.png
192 ms
Frozen-Collagen-300x300.png
696 ms
Kt-Gold-Night-Cream-300x300.png
184 ms
Kumiko-Collagen-Juice-300x300.png
177 ms
mano-slim-300x300.png
189 ms
telephone.png
188 ms
envelope.png
197 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
246 ms
besttopbeauty.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
besttopbeauty.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
besttopbeauty.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Besttopbeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Besttopbeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
besttopbeauty.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Top Beauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: