Tools & Wizards About Us
better--living.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

better--living.com

frontend_nuxt

Page Load Speed

730 ms in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

618 ms

Page Rendered

61 ms

better--living.com screenshot

About Website

Visit better--living.com now to see the best up-to-date Better Living content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about better--living.com

Get 100% FREE quotes for your home renovations.

Visit better--living.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Better--living.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 679 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

better--living.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,380 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

better--living.com

51 ms

better--living.com

318 ms

js

46 ms

510698f.js

22 ms

8317652.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Better--living.com, 13% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (318 ms) belongs to the original domain Better--living.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 248.6 kB (66%)

Content Size

376.2 kB

After Optimization

127.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Better--living.com main page is 376.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 299.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 248.6 kB

  • Original 299.2 kB
  • After minification 299.2 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 248.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 77.0 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (83%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Living. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

better--living.com

better--living.com

51 ms

better--living.com

better--living.com

318 ms

js

js

46 ms

510698f.js

510698f.js

22 ms

8317652.js

8317652.js

68 ms

b3926f2.js

b3926f2.js

68 ms

20ca4f8.js

20ca4f8.js

55 ms

7c0d535.js

7c0d535.js

20 ms

Accessibility Review

better--living.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

better--living.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

better--living.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Better--living.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Better--living.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

better--living.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Living. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: