2.9 sec in total
108 ms
2.1 sec
695 ms
Welcome to better-web.dk homepage info - get ready to check Better Web best content right away, or after learning these important things about better-web.dk
A growth hacking agency
Visit better-web.dkWe analyzed Better-web.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
better-web.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
108 ms
46 ms
107 ms
43 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Better-web.dk, 9% (11 requests) were made to Growth.studio and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.dreamdata.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (603 ms) relates to the external source Growth.studio.
Page size can be reduced by 45.1 kB (5%)
828.3 kB
783.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Better-web.dk main page is 828.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 534.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Better Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 483 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Better-web.dk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (36%)
25
16
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
108 ms
inter.css
46 ms
370bbc45b1.css
107 ms
css2
43 ms
js
83 ms
3.4.3
27 ms
pro.min.css
44 ms
pro-v4-shims.min.css
70 ms
pro-v5-font-face.min.css
95 ms
pro-v4-font-face.min.css
132 ms
lftracker_v1_lAxoEaK1npD7OYGd.js
435 ms
dreamdata.min.js
127 ms
growthstudio-logo2-white.svg
119 ms
pexels-photo-3184611.jpeg
182 ms
pexels-photo-7476135.jpeg
213 ms
da.png
212 ms
growthstudio-logo2.svg
296 ms
lady.jpg
603 ms
samsung.svg
308 ms
lomax.png
302 ms
ebay.svg
314 ms
stylepit.png
321 ms
velux.svg
398 ms
growth-studio-icon.png
396 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-0.ttf
38 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-1.ttf
34 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-2.ttf
38 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-3.ttf
71 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-4.ttf
72 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.ttf
73 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-6.ttf
74 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-7.ttf
75 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-8.ttf
73 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-9.ttf
74 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-10.ttf
90 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-11.ttf
75 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-12.ttf
79 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-13.ttf
76 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-14.ttf
77 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-15.ttf
79 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-16.ttf
90 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-17.ttf
88 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-18.ttf
90 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-19.ttf
97 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-20.ttf
92 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-21.ttf
98 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-22.ttf
103 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-0.ttf
97 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-1.ttf
130 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-2.ttf
107 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-3.ttf
107 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-4.ttf
115 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.ttf
110 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-6.ttf
119 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-7.ttf
123 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-8.ttf
127 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-9.ttf
129 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-10.ttf
134 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-11.ttf
137 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-12.ttf
138 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-13.ttf
114 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-14.ttf
115 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-15.ttf
110 ms
p
102 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-16.ttf
82 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-17.ttf
86 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-18.ttf
86 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-19.ttf
92 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-20.ttf
86 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-21.ttf
90 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-22.ttf
105 ms
pro-fa-light-300-0.ttf
95 ms
pro-fa-light-300-1.ttf
112 ms
pro-fa-light-300-2.ttf
98 ms
pro-fa-light-300-3.ttf
105 ms
pro-fa-light-300-4.ttf
99 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.ttf
98 ms
pro-fa-light-300-6.ttf
103 ms
pro-fa-light-300-7.ttf
107 ms
pro-fa-light-300-8.ttf
114 ms
pro-fa-light-300-9.ttf
104 ms
pro-fa-light-300-10.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-light-300-11.ttf
115 ms
pro-fa-light-300-12.ttf
111 ms
pro-fa-light-300-13.ttf
109 ms
pro-fa-light-300-14.ttf
124 ms
pro-fa-light-300-15.ttf
111 ms
pro-fa-light-300-16.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-light-300-17.ttf
111 ms
pro-fa-light-300-18.ttf
129 ms
pro-fa-light-300-19.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-light-300-20.ttf
105 ms
pro-fa-light-300-21.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-light-300-22.ttf
111 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-0.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-1.ttf
103 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-2.ttf
99 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-3.ttf
104 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-4.ttf
110 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-5.ttf
107 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-6.ttf
102 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-7.ttf
107 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-8.ttf
106 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-9.ttf
132 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-10.ttf
109 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-11.ttf
109 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-12.ttf
103 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-13.ttf
104 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-14.ttf
101 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-15.ttf
113 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-16.ttf
109 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-17.ttf
98 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-18.ttf
113 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-19.ttf
108 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-20.ttf
109 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-21.ttf
121 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-22.ttf
106 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
38 ms
better-web.dk accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
better-web.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
better-web.dk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Better-web.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Better-web.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
better-web.dk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: