Tools & Wizards About Us
bettertech.sa screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

bettertech.sa

The Best Software and Web Development Company in Saudi Arabia | Bettertech

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

368 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

bettertech.sa screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bettertech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bettertech.sa

Bettertech is the leading web development company in Saudi Arabia and we offer website design, software development, mobile app development, digital marketing services and branding services

Visit bettertech.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Bettertech.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bettertech.sa performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bettertech.sa

368 ms

gtm.js

95 ms

css

81 ms

css

107 ms

animate.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Bettertech.sa, 6% (8 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) belongs to the original domain Bettertech.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (49%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bettertech.sa main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 111.5 kB
  • After minification 81.2 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 215.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bettertech needs image optimization as it can save up to 215.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 877.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 363.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 877.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 650.4 kB

  • Original 754.0 kB
  • After minification 610.4 kB
  • After compression 103.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bettertech.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 650.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (55%)

Requests Now

109

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bettertech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bettertech.sa

bettertech.sa

368 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

css

css

81 ms

css

css

107 ms

animate.css

animate.css

126 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

194 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

131 ms

icofont.css

icofont.css

154 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

86 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

100 ms

slick.css

slick.css

120 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

133 ms

slider-range.css

slider-range.css

188 ms

app.css

app.css

245 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

44 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

57 ms

swiper-bundle.js

swiper-bundle.js

76 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

62 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

32 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

19 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

24 ms

1744f3f671.js

1744f3f671.js

44 ms

embed.js

embed.js

46 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

131 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

101 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

145 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

137 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

167 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

167 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

171 ms

instafeed.min.js

instafeed.min.js

170 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

269 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

270 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

269 ms

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

271 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

272 ms

scrollax.min.js

scrollax.min.js

272 ms

js

js

69 ms

wow.js

wow.js

273 ms

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

273 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

426 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

273 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

275 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

274 ms

slider-range.js

slider-range.js

273 ms

vivus.min.js

vivus.min.js

309 ms

tippy.all.min.js

tippy.all.min.js

310 ms

app.js

app.js

310 ms

swiper-bundle.js

swiper-bundle.js

47 ms

logo.png

logo.png

95 ms

client3.png

client3.png

95 ms

banner.png

banner.png

138 ms

line.png

line.png

117 ms

topimage.png

topimage.png

342 ms

group.png

group.png

158 ms

technologies.png

technologies.png

116 ms

Application.png

Application.png

148 ms

ecommerce.png

ecommerce.png

148 ms

globe.png

globe.png

206 ms

financial.png

financial.png

206 ms

ipix.png

ipix.png

207 ms

lanoza.png

lanoza.png

340 ms

bridge.png

bridge.png

365 ms

zsuite.png

zsuite.png

342 ms

oxap.png

oxap.png

365 ms

lms.png

lms.png

364 ms

testimonial.png

testimonial.png

365 ms

ARMANI.png

ARMANI.png

364 ms

Atlas-ocean-co.png

Atlas-ocean-co.png

318 ms

Avon.png

Avon.png

407 ms

SK-ecoplant.png

SK-ecoplant.png

385 ms

carlo-gavazzi-arabia.png

carlo-gavazzi-arabia.png

369 ms

FGOC.png

FGOC.png

340 ms

HUTA-group.png

HUTA-group.png

342 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

356 ms

sacep.png

sacep.png

386 ms

saleh-al-qadi.png

saleh-al-qadi.png

412 ms

srco-phoenix.png

srco-phoenix.png

423 ms

WASILMED.png

WASILMED.png

409 ms

Microsoft-Partner-Logo.jpg

Microsoft-Partner-Logo.jpg

430 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

62 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

70 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

80 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

89 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

90 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

90 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

452 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

59 ms

1744f3f671.css

1744f3f671.css

64 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

408 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

443 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

498 ms

intel.png

intel.png

441 ms

kingston.png

kingston.png

446 ms

adobe.png

adobe.png

444 ms

western-digital.jpg

western-digital.jpg

443 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

22 ms

IBM.png

IBM.png

424 ms

hp.png

hp.png

425 ms

cisco.png

cisco.png

424 ms

apc.png

apc.png

432 ms

6135bc6cef0a6c4814d2cb0a

6135bc6cef0a6c4814d2cb0a

364 ms

lenovo.png

lenovo.png

379 ms

oracle.webp

oracle.webp

424 ms

autodesk.png

autodesk.png

423 ms

email.png

email.png

291 ms

mobile.png

mobile.png

291 ms

header-logo.svg

header-logo.svg

290 ms

client1.png

client1.png

277 ms

bestvalue.png

bestvalue.png

280 ms

clutch-new.png

clutch-new.png

296 ms

goodfirms.png

goodfirms.png

281 ms

top-ecommerce-app-development-companies.svg

top-ecommerce-app-development-companies.svg

297 ms

client5.png

client5.png

295 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

297 ms

fb.png

fb.png

287 ms

insta.png

insta.png

283 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

284 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

274 ms

common.css

common.css

128 ms

card.css

card.css

146 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

159 ms

flex-polyfill.js

flex-polyfill.js

149 ms

common.js

common.js

153 ms

Accessibility Review

bettertech.sa accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bettertech.sa best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bettertech.sa SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bettertech.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bettertech.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bettertech.sa

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bettertech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: