Tools & Wizards About Us
bid72.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bid72.com

bid72 – Fit to bid! | the addictive app for bridge bidding – Fit to bid! – the premium app on bridge bidding

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

460 ms

bid72.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bid 72 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bid72.com

Fit to bid! – the premium app on bridge bidding

Visit bid72.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bid72.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bid72.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bid72.com

271 ms

bid72.com

665 ms

style.css

93 ms

style.min.css

192 ms

tcc_block_styles.css

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Bid72.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bid72.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

994.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bid72.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 715.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 62.8 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 89.1 kB

  • Original 715.7 kB
  • After minification 626.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bid 72 needs image optimization as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 237.2 kB
  • After minification 237.2 kB
  • After compression 229.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 128.6 kB
  • After minification 128.6 kB
  • After compression 126.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bid72.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bid 72. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bid72.com

bid72.com

271 ms

bid72.com

bid72.com

665 ms

style.css

style.css

93 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

192 ms

tcc_block_styles.css

tcc_block_styles.css

251 ms

styles.css

styles.css

251 ms

css

css

37 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

446 ms

extra.css

extra.css

278 ms

slick.css

slick.css

287 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

281 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

66 ms

front-end.css

front-end.css

335 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

503 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

382 ms

sharedJS.js

sharedJS.js

376 ms

js

js

48 ms

lsb-form.css

lsb-form.css

379 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

423 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

466 ms

index.js

index.js

474 ms

index.js

index.js

472 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

573 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

575 ms

superfish.args.min.js

superfish.args.min.js

575 ms

skip-links.min.js

skip-links.min.js

575 ms

slick.js

slick.js

664 ms

extra.js

extra.js

661 ms

responsive-menus.min.js

responsive-menus.min.js

660 ms

main.js

main.js

661 ms

Bid72-logo-RGB-master-copy-01.svg

Bid72-logo-RGB-master-copy-01.svg

142 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

556 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

539 ms

Scoring-3.jpg

Scoring-3.jpg

556 ms

4-576x10241-kopie.jpg

4-576x10241-kopie.jpg

537 ms

fin-random-brd.jpg

fin-random-brd.jpg

537 ms

nbw.jpg

nbw.jpg

555 ms

google-play-badge.png

google-play-badge.png

538 ms

apple-app-store.png

apple-app-store.png

554 ms

Last-train-cartoon-3.jpg

Last-train-cartoon-3.jpg

881 ms

help-1.png

help-1.png

554 ms

help-2.png

help-2.png

688 ms

help-3.png

help-3.png

690 ms

Logo-alfa.png

Logo-alfa.png

689 ms

Download-PlayStore-300x89.png

Download-PlayStore-300x89.png

688 ms

Download-appStore-300x89.png

Download-appStore-300x89.png

687 ms

ZUVa2hh4WUY

ZUVa2hh4WUY

179 ms

full_iphone_edit.png

full_iphone_edit.png

749 ms

bid72.com

bid72.com

1001 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

51 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

59 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

78 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

78 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

49 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

620 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

8 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

31 ms

base.js

base.js

59 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

164 ms

aDz_T_gaBrysQcZbaYaX8h92PYnkBHHJotKz2yKPZZ4.js

aDz_T_gaBrysQcZbaYaX8h92PYnkBHHJotKz2yKPZZ4.js

114 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

29 ms

id

id

34 ms

Create

Create

102 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

Accessibility Review

bid72.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bid72.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bid72.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bid72.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bid72.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bid72.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bid 72. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: