4.9 sec in total
106 ms
4.8 sec
88 ms
Welcome to bigintervale.net homepage info - get ready to check Big Interval E best content right away, or after learning these important things about bigintervale.net
Visit bigintervale.netWe analyzed Bigintervale.net page load time and found that the first response time was 106 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bigintervale.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
106 ms
42 ms
40 ms
38 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bigintervale.net, 41% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 473.3 kB (43%)
1.1 MB
621.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigintervale.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 590.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 467.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 467.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Interval E images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (48%)
25
13
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Interval E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bigintervale.net
106 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
40 ms
polyfill.min.js
38 ms
8875.e26292eb.bundle.min.js
118 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b7a35b00.bundle.min.js
112 ms
main.d98de0fd.bundle.min.js
115 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
110 ms
lodash.min.js
112 ms
react.production.min.js
112 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
115 ms
browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js
126 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
124 ms
288877_b6d1cd47b6604335b3dc74c85ad3b31d~mv2.jpeg
2957 ms
bundle.min.js
59 ms
red%20cottage.jpg
352 ms
ry%3D400%5B1%5D%20(2)_edited.jpg
235 ms
Big%20Intervale%20Fishing%20Lodge.jpg
385 ms
7d608d7b-ba49-4030-815f-744783ec5545_JPG.jpg
303 ms
288877_a1ab3257527942cd97c841617523eb03~mv2.jpeg
211 ms
288877_447b25b4f36747ae8c114a771e98412a~mv2.jpeg
4432 ms
Facebook%20Profile%20Picture.png
386 ms
87 ms
87 ms
89 ms
93 ms
92 ms
83 ms
121 ms
123 ms
121 ms
128 ms
127 ms
126 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
24 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
22 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
9 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
bigintervale.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
bigintervale.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bigintervale.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigintervale.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bigintervale.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bigintervale.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Big Interval E. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: