2.5 sec in total
85 ms
2.1 sec
251 ms
Visit bigrock.com now to see the best up-to-date Big Rock content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bigrock.com
Search and register domain names at the world's leading domain Registration & web hosting company. Now get 2 FREE Email Accounts with every domain name. Begin your domain search now.
Visit bigrock.comWe analyzed Bigrock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bigrock.com performance score
85 ms
292 ms
79 ms
24 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Bigrock.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) relates to the external source Aff.bigrock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 444.7 kB (47%)
948.0 kB
503.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigrock.com main page is 948.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Rock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 126.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigrock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (23%)
79
61
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigrock.com
85 ms
www.bigrock.com
292 ms
css
79 ms
fat-menu.css
24 ms
refer_a_friend.css
8 ms
style.css
25 ms
homepage.css
12 ms
z-custom.css
14 ms
jquery.js
17 ms
commonScripts.js
14 ms
cart.js
23 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
41 ms
innerfade.js
58 ms
all.js
45 ms
ga.js
46 ms
like.php
227 ms
getImage.php
104 ms
getImage.php
23 ms
getImage.php
20 ms
getImage.php
21 ms
getImage.php
150 ms
getImage.php
88 ms
getImage.php
22 ms
getImage.php
95 ms
getImage.php
90 ms
getImage.php
88 ms
getImage.php
93 ms
getImage.php
91 ms
getImage.php
100 ms
getImage.php
99 ms
getImage.php
98 ms
getImage.php
97 ms
getImage.php
105 ms
getImage.php
103 ms
getImage.php
100 ms
getImage.php
103 ms
getImage.php
103 ms
getImage.php
102 ms
getImage.php
104 ms
getImage.php
110 ms
getImage.php
104 ms
getImage.php
104 ms
getImage.php
106 ms
getImage.php
107 ms
getImage.php
109 ms
getImage.php
107 ms
getImage.php
111 ms
getImage.php
110 ms
getImage.php
112 ms
getImage.php
111 ms
wz_tooltip.js
105 ms
conversion.js
96 ms
footerScripts.js
110 ms
ga_event_tracking.js
108 ms
getImage.php
106 ms
getImage.php
107 ms
__utm.gif
70 ms
getImage.php
64 ms
getImage.php
62 ms
getImage.php
59 ms
getImage.php
60 ms
getImage.php
59 ms
getImage.php
68 ms
getImage.php
54 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
57 ms
getImage.php
55 ms
getImage.php
52 ms
getImage.php
52 ms
35 ms
108 ms
xd_arbiter.php
46 ms
xd_arbiter.php
74 ms
trackjs.js
639 ms
54 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
61 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
67 ms
track.php
952 ms
getImage.php
14 ms
content.php
177 ms
xd_arbiter.php
18 ms
bigrock.com SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigrock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bigrock.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
bigrock.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Big Rock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: