5 sec in total
639 ms
3.9 sec
495 ms
Click here to check amazing Big Rock content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bigrock.org
India's #1 Domain & Website hosting company offers a plethora of specialized web services, including domain hosting and website hosting. Buy a domain and hosting at the lowest prices with 24x7 support...
Visit bigrock.orgWe analyzed Bigrock.org page load time and found that the first response time was 639 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bigrock.org performance score
639 ms
2555 ms
17 ms
15 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bigrock.org, 51% (45 requests) were made to Assets.bigrock.in and 17% (15 requests) were made to Bigrock.in. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Bigrock.in.
Page size can be reduced by 712.2 kB (56%)
1.3 MB
550.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bigrock.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 468.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Big Rock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 311.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bigrock.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (37%)
83
52
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Big Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bigrock.org
639 ms
www.bigrock.in
2555 ms
fat-menu.css
17 ms
refer_a_friend.css
15 ms
style.css
28 ms
homepage.css
43 ms
z-custom.css
18 ms
jquery.js
26 ms
commonScripts.js
20 ms
cart.js
20 ms
trackjs.js
635 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
14 ms
track.php
692 ms
getImage.php
6 ms
getImage.php
19 ms
getImage.php
21 ms
getImage.php
17 ms
getImage.php
22 ms
getImage.php
38 ms
getImage.php
14 ms
getImage.php
14 ms
getImage.php
12 ms
getImage.php
18 ms
getImage.php
20 ms
getImage.php
21 ms
getImage.php
32 ms
sdk.js
185 ms
getImage.php
25 ms
getImage.php
27 ms
getImage.php
25 ms
getImage.php
27 ms
getImage.php
28 ms
getImage.php
29 ms
getImage.php
28 ms
getImage.php
63 ms
getImage.php
60 ms
getImage.php
67 ms
getImage.php
100 ms
getImage.php
89 ms
getImage.php
62 ms
getImage.php
60 ms
getImage.php
63 ms
getImage.php
66 ms
getImage.php
85 ms
getImage.php
92 ms
getImage.php
85 ms
getImage.php
88 ms
getImage.php
94 ms
getImage.php
94 ms
innerfade.js
63 ms
wz_tooltip.js
77 ms
footerScripts.js
77 ms
ga_event_tracking.js
79 ms
conversion.js
94 ms
getImage.php
84 ms
getImage.php
87 ms
getImage.php
83 ms
getImage.php
88 ms
getImage.php
45 ms
getImage.php
46 ms
getImage.php
45 ms
getImage.php
46 ms
getImage.php
47 ms
like.php
131 ms
getImage.php
27 ms
113 ms
64 ms
61 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
xd_arbiter.php
151 ms
xd_arbiter.php
274 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
hotjar-682.js
130 ms
getImage.php
31 ms
linkid.js
19 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
307 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
347 ms
58 ms
74 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
70 ms
fbds.js
42 ms
xd_arbiter.php
109 ms
3 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
35 ms
ga-audiences
25 ms
4e699c845120b5bf0e00601f.js
11 ms
chartbeat.js
20 ms
3 ms
bigrock.org SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bigrock.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bigrock.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
bigrock.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Big Rock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: