5 sec in total
2.3 sec
2.7 sec
62 ms
Visit bingley.church now to see the best up-to-date Bingley content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bingley.church
Visit bingley.churchWe analyzed Bingley.church page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
bingley.church performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value4.0 s
51/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
2273 ms
36 ms
32 ms
27 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bingley.church, 39% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Bingley.church.
Page size can be reduced by 259.5 kB (43%)
602.1 kB
342.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bingley.church main page is 602.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 335.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 256.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 256.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bingley images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)
19
9
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bingley. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bingley.church
2273 ms
minified.js
36 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
27 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
30 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
105 ms
lodash.min.js
106 ms
react.production.min.js
29 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
106 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
118 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
118 ms
84770f_6b2826cba0eb438699b1746f1782b95c~mv2.jpg
53 ms
bundle.min.js
49 ms
Holy%20Trinity%20Bingley%20and%20St%20Wilfrid%20Gilstead.png
263 ms
qYz9DdEJ_400x400.jpg
241 ms
11062b_a6d154bfda6d4921baa3cdf6b615a9db~mv2_d_5184_3456_s_4_2.jpg
74 ms
122 ms
120 ms
122 ms
114 ms
117 ms
115 ms
148 ms
148 ms
153 ms
150 ms
150 ms
150 ms
80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff
4 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
bingley.church accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bingley.church best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bingley.church SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bingley.church can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bingley.church main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bingley.church
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bingley. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: