2.3 sec in total
50 ms
1.7 sec
614 ms
Click here to check amazing Biocompare content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about biocompare.com
Find products, read reviews and hear about the latest technological developments on Biocompare
Visit biocompare.comWe analyzed Biocompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
biocompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value5,540 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value20.4 s
2/100
10%
50 ms
47 ms
188 ms
37 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Biocompare.com, 47% (59 requests) were made to Media.biocompare.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (876 ms) relates to the external source Media.biocompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.2 kB (2%)
5.3 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Biocompare.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Biocompare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (30%)
115
80
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biocompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
biocompare.com
50 ms
www.biocompare.com
47 ms
www.biocompare.com
188 ms
CommonStyleSheet.ashx
37 ms
AllSitesCommonJavaScript.ashx
80 ms
css
92 ms
css
108 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
92 ms
biocompare_omniture_26_3.js
73 ms
osano.js
245 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
93 ms
cn-ai-plugin.umd.js
98 ms
spm.v1.min.js
90 ms
AllSitesCommonFooterJavaScript.ashx
97 ms
CommonJavaScript.ashx
96 ms
ControlJavaScript.ashx
93 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
gosquared.js
19 ms
pv
72 ms
js
57 ms
destination
55 ms
destination
65 ms
us.gif
355 ms
antibody.png
42 ms
37.png
350 ms
612442-134x100.jpg
353 ms
612496-134x100.jpg
428 ms
596094-134x100.jpg
431 ms
612023-134x100.jpg
422 ms
121797-134x100.jpg
425 ms
612175-134x100.jpg
457 ms
612117-134x100.jpg
427 ms
560343-134x100.jpg
535 ms
607364-134x100.jpg
534 ms
612233-134x100.jpg
534 ms
612116-134x100.jpg
536 ms
612257-134x100.jpg
538 ms
611554-134x100.jpg
661 ms
612794-134x100.jpg
661 ms
565723-134x100.jpg
661 ms
588784-187x140.jpg
663 ms
597895-187x140.jpg
662 ms
332868-187x140.jpg
663 ms
335525-187x140.jpg
713 ms
583856-187x140.jpg
791 ms
591282-187x140.jpg
710 ms
590349-187x140.jpg
711 ms
575070-187x140.jpg
713 ms
107524-134x100.jpg
792 ms
102033-134x100.jpg
790 ms
104328-134x100.jpg
794 ms
106531-134x100.jpg
790 ms
100443-134x100.jpg
793 ms
105815-134x100.jpg
842 ms
107695-134x100.jpg
875 ms
107417-134x100.jpg
876 ms
100120-134x100.jpg
841 ms
100041-134x100.jpg
874 ms
100828-134x100.jpg
874 ms
elisa.png
269 ms
biomolecules.png
293 ms
flow_cytometer_icon.png
292 ms
assaykit.png
293 ms
cells.png
293 ms
chromatography.png
343 ms
Cytometers.png
345 ms
thermal.png
413 ms
Microscopes.png
345 ms
microplate_reader.png
389 ms
Gel-Imaging-Systems.png
388 ms
facebook-white.svg
421 ms
linkedin-white.svg
419 ms
x-logo.svg
416 ms
icon-youtube.svg
520 ms
header-bg.jpg
507 ms
searchBar-general-icon.png
507 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
499 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
625 ms
rum.min.js
808 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
183 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
435 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
434 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
434 ms
vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9gTuoyjkj.ttf
433 ms
vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9Zjyoyjkj.ttf
516 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
99 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
112 ms
spriteMedium.png
187 ms
107845-134x100.jpg
600 ms
106812-134x100.jpg
600 ms
107362-134x100.jpg
598 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
155 ms
eg5xm_c9tva5_6d9dcf96.png
486 ms
107196-134x100.jpg
531 ms
103059-134x100.jpg
522 ms
106706-134x100.jpg
456 ms
107705-134x100.jpg
524 ms
100176-134x100.jpg
524 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
106 ms
cn_retina.png
205 ms
selectedArrow.png
204 ms
102003-134x100.jpg
499 ms
all.js
299 ms
s58441235136706
179 ms
598247-52x39.jpg
419 ms
608645-52x39.jpg
421 ms
598218-52x39.jpg
421 ms
612687-134x100.jpg
418 ms
612015-134x100.jpg
416 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
106 ms
comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net
187 ms
menu-hover-bg2.jpg
84 ms
eg5xm_yagc5r_51204fae.jpg
313 ms
612511-134x100.jpg
296 ms
612311-134x100.jpg
295 ms
612494-134x100.jpg
296 ms
612570-134x100.jpg
313 ms
612568-134x100.jpg
315 ms
612569-134x100.jpg
313 ms
612573-134x100.jpg
284 ms
612517-134x100.jpg
267 ms
612516-134x100.jpg
265 ms
all.js
43 ms
ajax-loader.gif
33 ms
ajax-loader-blue.gif
16 ms
biocompare.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA tooltip elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
biocompare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biocompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biocompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
biocompare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Biocompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: