3.5 sec in total
324 ms
2.5 sec
701 ms
Welcome to bioform.no homepage info - get ready to check Bioform best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about bioform.no
Bioform tilbyr kvalitetsprodukter, som fungerer, innenfor kosttilskudd, urtedrikker og sportsernæring. Vi leverer produkter med høy kvalitet til en hyggelig pris. Produktene inneholder naturlige lukra...
Visit bioform.noWe analyzed Bioform.no page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bioform.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value2,490 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.362
30/100
15%
Value35.0 s
0/100
10%
324 ms
207 ms
806 ms
253 ms
370 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Bioform.no, 13% (9 requests) were made to Bioformas-i02.mycdn.no and 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Bioform.no.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (31%)
8.2 MB
5.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Bioform.no main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 214.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 58.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bioform needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 983 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bioform.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
56
34
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bioform. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bioform.no
324 ms
www.bioform.no
207 ms
www.bioform.no
806 ms
global.css.php
253 ms
global.js.php
370 ms
js
69 ms
js
124 ms
js
118 ms
consent.css
220 ms
consent.js
216 ms
emojis.js
218 ms
masonry-4.2.2.pkgd.min.js
713 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
292 ms
bootstrap-tabcollapse.js
294 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
293 ms
colorbox.css
323 ms
custom_javascript.js
445 ms
custom_stylesheet.css
447 ms
css
45 ms
font-awesome.min.css
444 ms
dropdown.css
453 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.css
454 ms
style.css
451 ms
iframe_api
44 ms
fbevents.js
95 ms
widgets.js
249 ms
client.js
254 ms
w1920h780.jpg
723 ms
w600h600.png
318 ms
w600h600.png
317 ms
w600h600.png
328 ms
w600h600.png
318 ms
klarna.svg
268 ms
Header11.27.194.png
164 ms
upload_15754639005de7abdca3f20.png
462 ms
icon.png
164 ms
icon.gif
164 ms
icon.png
164 ms
w600h600.png
411 ms
w600h600.png
407 ms
w600h600.png
405 ms
w600h600.jpg
332 ms
w600h600.png
403 ms
w600h600.jpg
397 ms
w600h600.png
405 ms
w600h600.jpg
724 ms
w600h600.png
399 ms
w600h600.png
407 ms
w600h600.png
400 ms
w600h600.png
401 ms
w600h600.png
404 ms
w600h600.png
406 ms
w600h600.jpg
408 ms
w600h600.jpg
409 ms
w600h600.png
406 ms
w600h600.jpg
401 ms
w600h600.jpg
405 ms
w600h600.jpg
405 ms
supported_browsers
162 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf
191 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3ig.ttf
225 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3ig.ttf
253 ms
fa-light-300.woff
253 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
292 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
282 ms
www-widgetapi.js
151 ms
XRXK3I6Li01BKofIMPyPbj8d7IEAGXNic3cHjabf.ttf
206 ms
XRXK3I6Li01BKofIMPyPbj8d7IEAGXNirXAHjabf.ttf
203 ms
XRXK3I6Li01BKofIMPyPbj8d7IEAGXNi83AHjabf.ttf
205 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
297 ms
bioform.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bioform.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bioform.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
NO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bioform.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bioform.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bioform.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bioform. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: