6.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.6 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Bizpedia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bizpedia.com
Bizpedia: Human Focused, Technology Assisted Networking Services.
Visit bizpedia.comWe analyzed Bizpedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bizpedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value7,460 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
1430 ms
178 ms
264 ms
31 ms
180 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bizpedia.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Biz-pedia.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 409.5 kB (38%)
1.1 MB
672.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Bizpedia.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 571.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bizpedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bizpedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (30%)
76
53
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bizpedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.biz-pedia.co.uk
1430 ms
flexslider.css
178 ms
font-awesome.min.css
264 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
180 ms
styles.css
187 ms
normalize.css
181 ms
style.css
329 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
454 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
325 ms
conditionizr-4.3.0.min.js
328 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
358 ms
jquery.js
626 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
jquery.stellar.js
599 ms
modernizr.js
403 ms
respond.min.js
449 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
736 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
590 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
744 ms
customJquery.js
603 ms
comment-reply.min.js
547 ms
jquery.form.min.js
548 ms
scripts.js
683 ms
wp-embed.min.js
682 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
629 ms
logo.png
199 ms
mobButton.png
191 ms
BIZPEDIA-HOME-GOLD-BOARDROOM-1100x675.jpg
1038 ms
BIZ-SMALL-ACCESS-345x203.jpg
189 ms
BIZ-SMALL-GALLERY1-345x203.jpg
195 ms
BIZ-SMALL-TEST1-345x203.jpg
203 ms
LCM-170x77.jpg
236 ms
VISION-170x77.jpg
235 ms
LESTER-BRUNT-170x77.jpg
248 ms
WILKINS-170x77.jpg
251 ms
SYN-STAR-170x77.jpg
260 ms
SAM-170x77.jpg
371 ms
PROSPERITY-170x77.jpg
368 ms
NET-PRIMATES-170x77.jpg
382 ms
MARKET-MAKERS-170x77.jpg
375 ms
LION-170x77.jpg
384 ms
DELICIOUS-170x77.jpg
468 ms
ABBEY-170x77.jpg
468 ms
COFFIN-MEW-170x77.jpg
472 ms
BREEZE-170x77.jpg
475 ms
ACTUON-COACH-170x77.jpg
485 ms
PETER-COOPER-170x77.jpg
505 ms
Saxe-Coburg-Logo-NEW-2014-1920x1893-170x77.jpg
503 ms
SAFFREY-170x77.jpg
515 ms
REAL-RECRUITMENT-170x77.jpg
515 ms
PORTMORE1-170x77.jpg
526 ms
LACEYS400x400-170x77.png
1029 ms
GHS-Mechanical-Electrical-170x77.jpg
1030 ms
IMG_0383-170x77.jpeg
1045 ms
GIANT-LEAP-COLOUR-170x77.jpg
1043 ms
BARCLAYS1-170x77.jpg
1045 ms
Nine-Twenty-Energy-170x77.png
1045 ms
M12-Solutions-170x77.jpg
1046 ms
SOLENT-MOBILITY-170x77.jpg
1046 ms
WPA-170x77.jpg
907 ms
SMITH-WILLIAMSON-170x77.jpg
871 ms
REALITY-HR-170x77.jpg
872 ms
GREENFIELD-170x77.jpg
867 ms
HOT-170x77.jpg
866 ms
BUILDWELL-170x77.jpg
900 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
64 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
149 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
159 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
149 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
158 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xONSK5BxN3NFS4EJkViHIqo.woff
146 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xF1YPouZEKgzpqZW9wN-3Ek.woff
149 ms
COWLING-170x77.jpg
892 ms
FP-WEALTH-170x77.jpg
862 ms
GLOBAL-170x77.jpg
856 ms
IDEAL-170x77.jpg
871 ms
IFX-170x77.jpg
860 ms
INTERGAGE-170x77.jpg
857 ms
NIX-170x77.jpg
753 ms
PURPLE-170x77.jpg
749 ms
FEATURED-TAPAS2-535x150.jpg
745 ms
FEATURED-REAL2-535x150.jpg
743 ms
footLogo.png
660 ms
bizpedia.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bizpedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bizpedia.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bizpedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bizpedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bizpedia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bizpedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: