7.5 sec in total
2.9 sec
4.2 sec
401 ms
Visit bladder.nl now to see the best up-to-date Bladder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bladder.nl
Bladder.nl | Praktische hulp bij digitale innovatie | identity and access management | AVG | ISO-27002
Visit bladder.nlWe analyzed Bladder.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bladder.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value2.0 s
97/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
2864 ms
36 ms
91 ms
175 ms
796 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Bladder.nl, 7% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Bladder.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 623.1 kB (66%)
940.4 kB
317.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Bladder.nl main page is 940.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 407.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bladder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 241.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.0 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bladder.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)
43
12
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bladder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bladder.nl
2864 ms
webfont.js
36 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
91 ms
flick.css
175 ms
bladder.nl
796 ms
style.css
179 ms
default.min.css
175 ms
jetpack.css
185 ms
addtoany.min.css
175 ms
jquery.js
435 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
257 ms
scrollTo.js
260 ms
jquery.form.min.js
263 ms
mailchimp.js
264 ms
core.min.js
343 ms
datepicker.js
447 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
349 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
357 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
429 ms
graphene.js
438 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
445 ms
wp_eStore_custom_style.css
514 ms
eStore_read_form.js
516 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
wpgroho.js
522 ms
wp-embed.min.js
527 ms
e-201611.js
9 ms
css
25 ms
bg_g.png
400 ms
bg-gradient.png
399 ms
sprite_h.png
407 ms
rss.png
408 ms
sprite_master.png
407 ms
cropped-003.jpg
411 ms
wordpress-logo-notext-rgb-150x150.png
407 ms
logo-gl-footer-150x64.png
408 ms
page.js
13 ms
genericons-regular-webfont.woff
379 ms
sm13.html
320 ms
hovercard.css
61 ms
services.css
63 ms
ga.js
60 ms
icons.15.svg.css
44 ms
g.gif
9 ms
bladder.nl accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
bladder.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bladder.nl SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bladder.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bladder.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bladder.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bladder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: