Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

blighter.com

Radars for Border, Perimeter, Coastline & Drone Security | Blighter

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

322 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

351 ms

blighter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Blighter content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about blighter.com

Best-in-class e-scan ground radar sytems for border security, drone detection, C-UAS, perimeter security, wide area surveillance and coastline protection.

Visit blighter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Blighter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blighter.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.763

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

blighter.com

322 ms

www.blighter.com

754 ms

reset.css

220 ms

styles.css

308 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

515 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Blighter.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Blighter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.5 kB (26%)

Content Size

595.6 kB

After Optimization

438.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Blighter.com main page is 595.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 415.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 415.6 kB
  • After minification 372.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blighter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 80.6 kB

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 136.4 kB
  • After compression 56.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 19.0 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blighter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (26%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blighter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

blighter.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

High

[role] values are not valid

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

blighter.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

blighter.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blighter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blighter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blighter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: