Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

blimar.com

Blimar blisteadoras

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

452 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

398 ms

blimar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to blimar.com homepage info - get ready to check Blimar best content right away, or after learning these important things about blimar.com

Tenemos más de 25 años de experiencia en la fabricación y venta de blisteadoras. Nuestras blisteadoras forman y sellan en la misma máquina y con un solo operador.

Visit blimar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Blimar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 452 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blimar.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,790 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

blimar.com

452 ms

www.blimar.com

507 ms

imageSwap.js

313 ms

swfobject.js

440 ms

jquery.js

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Blimar.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to App.onlinephotofiler.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) belongs to the original domain Blimar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.3 kB (27%)

Content Size

383.7 kB

After Optimization

278.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Blimar.com main page is 383.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 225.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 225.3 kB
  • After minification 211.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blimar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 67.2 kB

  • Original 126.1 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blimar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (63%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blimar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

blimar.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

blimar.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

blimar.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blimar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Blimar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blimar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: